timothy sykes logo
SMR Stock Slides As Lawsuits Mount And Wall Street Turns Cautious Thumbnail

SMR Stock Slides As Lawsuits Mount And Wall Street Turns Cautious

BRYCE TUOHEYUPDATED MAY. 18, 2026, 5:03 PM ET
Reviewed by Tim Sykesand Fact-checked by Matt Monaco

NuScale Power Corporation stocks have been trading down by -5.79 percent amid heightened concerns over project financing and regulatory delays.

Candlestick Chart

Live Update At 17:03:11 EDT: On Monday, May 18, 2026 NuScale Power Corporation stock [NYSE: SMR] is trending down by -5.79%! Discover the key drivers behind this movement as well as our expert analysis in the detailed breakdown below.

Quick Financial Overview

NuScale Power, trading under ticker SMR, is behaving like a classic story stock whose numbers haven’t caught up to the narrative. The latest quarterly filing shows just $565,000 in total revenue against $58.1M in expenses and a net loss of $44M. That is a tiny top line for a company valued at a steep price‑to‑sales ratio above 200.

SMR’s income statement is loaded with research and general and administrative costs, which is normal for an early‑stage technology story, but the losses are heavy. EBITDA came in around –$57.2M for the quarter, and operating cash flow was roughly –$314.7M. Free cash flow was about –$316.2M, so NuScale is burning cash fast.

On the plus side, SMR still shows a strong liquidity cushion. Cash and short‑term investments are close to $890M, with a current ratio around 4.3 and no meaningful long‑term debt. That buys NuScale time. But the return metrics are ugly, with return on equity and return on assets deeply negative, making this a high‑risk development‑stage nuclear play.

On the chart, SMR has broken down from the $13s in late April to about $10.48 on the latest close, with intraday action pinned in a tight $10.2–$10.6 band. That tells traders the stock is in a cooling phase, waiting for the next catalyst.

Why Traders Are Watching SMR Right Now

SMR is in the spotlight for all the wrong reasons, and that’s exactly why active traders are glued to it. The headline issue is the securities class action blasting NuScale Power over its relationship with ENTRA1 Energy. The complaint centers on a massive $495M payment tied to a TVA agreement that helped trigger a brutal $532M quarterly net loss and a plunge in SMR from above $57 to near $17 by 2025/11. That’s not a minor bump — it’s a full‑on reset of expectations.

Rosen Law Firm and Faruqi & Faruqi are both pushing class actions that argue NuScale misled the market about ENTRA1’s experience and the real risks inside its commercialization strategy. For traders, that goes beyond accounting noise. These lawsuits question whether SMR’s core deployment roadmap for its small modular reactors was sold as safer and more mature than it really was.

Another suit claims NuScale’s reliance on ENTRA1 exposed SMR to hidden risks of project failure, timetable delays, and regulatory problems. That kind of language hits the heart of any long‑dated clean‑energy story. If regulators or counterparties start doubting the plan, future cash flows get discounted hard.

Then there’s the Fluor angle. Fluor, once a key strategic backer, has fully exited its 40M‑share NuScale position via about $2.43B of open‑market sales since 2025/09. For SMR traders, that explains a lot of the persistent selling pressure. The flip side: with Fluor out, that big overhang is gone, and future supply from that seller is off the table.

Layer on top the Street’s fading confidence. Citi has slashed its SMR price target twice — first from $11.50 to $9, then down again to $7 — while sticking with a Sell rating and flagging a tough earnings backdrop for alt‑energy equipment names. Goldman Sachs trimmed its target from $10 to $9 and stayed Neutral, a quieter but still negative revision. When multiple firms walk targets lower like that, momentum traders listen.

All of this leaves SMR sitting in a high‑volatility zone where bad news is priced in, but sharp squeezes are always possible on any upside surprise.

More Breaking News

Conclusion

NuScale Power is exactly the kind of name that can reward prepared traders and punish lazy ones. The SMR story sits at the crossroads of ambitious nuclear tech, heavy cash burn, major legal battles, and wavering Wall Street support. The financials show a company with plenty of cash today but no clear line of sight yet to meaningful, recurring revenue. The lawsuits allege that SMR’s commercialization partner ENTRA1 was oversold and under‑disclosed, and that a $495M payment helped blow a gigantic hole in one quarter’s results.

At the same time, Fluor’s full exit and the series of price‑target cuts from Citi and Goldman frame SMR as a battleground ticker. Some traders will see a broken story; others will see a crowded short and a possible squeeze candidate if NuScale delivers any credible progress on deployments or regulatory wins.

The key is to treat SMR like the speculative trade it is. Size small, respect the volatility, and focus on the chart. As Tim Sykes loves to remind his students, “The market doesn’t care about your opinion, it cares about price action — adapt or you’re dead.” As millionaire penny stock trader and teacher Tim Sykes says, “Embrace the journey, the ups and downs; each mistake is a lesson to improve your strategy.” For educational and research‑focused traders, SMR is a live case study in how hype, legal risk, and real numbers collide.

This is stock news, not investment advice. Timothy Sykes News delivers real-time stock market news focused on key catalysts driving short-term price movements. Our content is tailored for active traders and investors seeking to capitalize on rapid price fluctuations, particularly in volatile sectors like penny stocks. Readers come to us for detailed coverage on earnings reports, mergers, FDA approvals, new contracts, and unusual trading volumes that can trigger significant short-term price action. Some users utilize our news to explain sudden stock movements, while others rely on it for diligent research into potential investment opportunities.

Dive deeper into the world of trading with Timothy Sykes, renowned for his expertise in penny stocks. Explore his top picks and discover the strategies that have propelled him to success with these articles:

Once you’ve got some stocks on watch, elevate your trading game with StocksToTrade the ultimate platform for traders. With specialized tools for swing and day trading, StocksToTrade will guide you through the market’s twists and turns.
Dig into StocksToTrade’s watchlists here:



How much has this post helped you?


Leave a reply

* Results are not typical and will vary from person to person. Making money trading stocks takes time, dedication, and hard work. There are inherent risks involved with investing in the stock market, including the loss of your investment. Past performance in the market is not indicative of future results. Any investment is at your own risk. See Terms of Service here

The available research on day trading suggests that most active traders lose money. Fees and overtrading are major contributors to these losses.

A 2000 study called “Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors” evaluated 66,465 U.S. households that held stocks from 1991 to 1996. The households that traded most averaged an 11.4% annual return during a period where the overall market gained 17.9%. These lower returns were attributed to overconfidence.

A 2014 paper (revised 2019) titled “Learning Fast or Slow?” analyzed the complete transaction history of the Taiwan Stock Exchange between 1992 and 2006. It looked at the ongoing performance of day traders in this sample, and found that 97% of day traders can expect to lose money from trading, and more than 90% of all day trading volume can be traced to investors who predictably lose money. Additionally, it tied the behavior of gamblers and drivers who get more speeding tickets to overtrading, and cited studies showing that legalized gambling has an inverse effect on trading volume.

A 2019 research study (revised 2020) called “Day Trading for a Living?” observed 19,646 Brazilian futures contract traders who started day trading from 2013 to 2015, and recorded two years of their trading activity. The study authors found that 97% of traders with more than 300 days actively trading lost money, and only 1.1% earned more than the Brazilian minimum wage ($16 USD per day). They hypothesized that the greater returns shown in previous studies did not differentiate between frequent day traders and those who traded rarely, and that more frequent trading activity decreases the chance of profitability.

These studies show the wide variance of the available data on day trading profitability. One thing that seems clear from the research is that most day traders lose money .

Millionaire Media 66 W Flagler St. Ste. 900 Miami, FL 33130 United States (888) 878-3621 This is for information purposes only as Millionaire Media LLC nor Timothy Sykes is registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser. No information herein is intended as securities brokerage, investment, tax, accounting or legal advice, as an offer or solicitation of an offer to sell or buy, or as an endorsement, recommendation or sponsorship of any company, security or fund. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes cannot and does not assess, verify or guarantee the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information, the suitability or profitability of any particular investment, or the potential value of any investment or informational source. The reader bears responsibility for his/her own investment research and decisions, should seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before making any investment, and investigate and fully understand any and all risks before investing. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes in no way warrants the solvency, financial condition, or investment advisability of any of the securities mentioned in communications or websites. In addition, Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this information. This information is not intended to be used as the sole basis of any investment decision, nor should it be construed as advice designed to meet the investment needs of any particular investor. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future returns.

Citations for Disclaimer

Barber, Brad M. and Odean, Terrance, Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors. Available at SSRN: “Day Trading for a Living?”

Barber, Brad M. and Lee, Yi-Tsung and Liu, Yu-Jane and Odean, Terrance and Zhang, Ke, Learning Fast or Slow? (May 28, 2019). Forthcoming: Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=2535636”

Chague, Fernando and De-Losso, Rodrigo and Giovannetti, Bruno, Day Trading for a Living? (June 11, 2020). Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=3423101”