timothy sykes logo
CLF Stock Slips Onto Watchlists After Barclays Underweight Call Thumbnail

CLF Stock Slips Onto Watchlists After Barclays Underweight Call

ELLIS HOBBSUPDATED JUN. 8, 2026, 5:04 PM ET
Reviewed by Matt Monacoand Fact-checked by Bryce Tuohey

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. stocks have been trading down by -6.58 percent amid sharply negative sentiment over weakening steel demand.

Candlestick Chart

Live Update At 17:03:54 EDT: On Monday, June 08, 2026 Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. stock [NYSE: CLF] is trending down by -6.58%! Discover the key drivers behind this movement as well as our expert analysis in the detailed breakdown below.

Quick Financial Overview

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. has been trading like a rollercoaster the past few weeks. CLF ran from the low $10s in late May to highs above $15 on 2026/06/02, then bled back down into the mid-$12s by 2026/06/08. That’s a fast round-trip move, and it tells traders sentiment is fragile and headline-driven.

Intraday, CLF spent most of the latest session chopping between $12.45 and $12.90 before closing at $12.68. The stock sold hard at the open from $13.31 and never reclaimed that level, a clear sign of overhead supply from recent bagholders.

Fundamentals show why big money is cautious. CLF generated about $18.61B in revenue over the last year, but profitability is thin to negative. Profit margins are in the red, and the latest quarter showed a net loss of roughly $237M with an operating loss and EBITDA of only about $100M. Cash flow is also under pressure: Cleveland-Cliffs reported negative free cash flow of about $477M and operating cash outflow of $325M, while still leaning on debt issuance for liquidity.

With total debt to equity at 1.33 and interest coverage just 0.2, CLF is clearly leveraged. That leverage turbocharges moves in both directions, which is exactly what short-term traders look for.

Why Traders Are Watching CLF After The Barclays Call

Barclays just threw a new wrench into the Cleveland-Cliffs story. The bank initiated coverage on CLF with an Underweight rating and a $9 price target, well below where the stock has been trading in recent days. For active traders, that’s a clear message: a major institution thinks CLF is priced too rich for the risk on its balance sheet.

The key detail is not just the Underweight tag. Barclays is actually constructive on steel prices and the metals and mining space overall. Yet Cleveland-Cliffs is one of the few names it singles out on the downside. When a firm likes the sector but doesn’t like your stock, that’s stock-specific, not macro. Traders need to respect that.

Barclays does give CLF some credit. It notes cost improvement efforts and possible margin gains as a legacy slab contract rolls off. That suggests Cleveland-Cliffs is not a broken business; it’s a leveraged one fighting to get leaner. But in the bank’s view, the higher leverage justifies a lower valuation multiple than peers. That neatly lines up with the financials: negative free cash flow, heavy long-term debt around $7.76B, and weak coverage of interest costs.

At the same time, the broader Street sits at a Hold with an average CLF price target of $10.37. So Barclays is more bearish than the pack, and that gap in opinion often fuels volatility. For day traders and swing traders, that means CLF can become a sentiment tug-of-war stock. When price gets near that $10–$11 band, watch how it reacts: does it bounce on dip buying or crack toward the Barclays $9 level?

More Breaking News

Conclusion

Cleveland-Cliffs sits at an uncomfortable crossroads. Technically, CLF has already pulled back from the $15 area to the mid-$12s, giving back a big part of its latest run. Fundamentally, the company is grinding through weak profitability, negative cash flow, and a hefty debt load that Barclays believes warrants a discount. The new Underweight rating with a $9 target is a line in the sand that many short-biased traders will anchor to.

On the other side, CLF still moves with steel sentiment, and Barclays itself admits the backdrop for steel prices and the broader metals group is constructive. If Cleveland-Cliffs executes on cost cuts and margins improve as that slab contract rolls off, the story can shift quickly. Add in a Street-wide Hold stance and a consensus price target hovering around $10.37, and you have enough disagreement to keep the tape lively.

For traders, the edge here comes from preparation, not prediction. Map the key levels: recent highs near $15, the current $12 area, the $10–$11 congestion zone, and the $9 Barclays target. Then wait for the stock to show its hand around those levels on volume before committing. As millionaire penny stock trader and teacher Tim Sykes says, “There is always another play around the corner; don’t chase just because you feel FOMO.” That mindset is especially important with a name like CLF that can lure traders into chasing strength or weakness instead of waiting for clean setups.

As Tim Sykes loves to remind his students, “The market doesn’t care about your opinion, only your preparation and risk management.” CLF is offering volatility and clear catalysts; disciplined traders will focus on the chart, the news flow, and cutting losses fast.

This is stock news, not investment advice. Timothy Sykes News delivers real-time stock market news focused on key catalysts driving short-term price movements. Our content is tailored for active traders and investors seeking to capitalize on rapid price fluctuations, particularly in volatile sectors like penny stocks. Readers come to us for detailed coverage on earnings reports, mergers, FDA approvals, new contracts, and unusual trading volumes that can trigger significant short-term price action. Some users utilize our news to explain sudden stock movements, while others rely on it for diligent research into potential investment opportunities.

Dive deeper into the world of trading with Timothy Sykes, renowned for his expertise in penny stocks. Explore his top picks and discover the strategies that have propelled him to success with these articles:

Once you’ve got some stocks on watch, elevate your trading game with StocksToTrade the ultimate platform for traders. With specialized tools for swing and day trading, StocksToTrade will guide you through the market’s twists and turns.
Dig into StocksToTrade’s watchlists here:



How much has this post helped you?


Leave a reply

* Results are not typical and will vary from person to person. Making money trading stocks takes time, dedication, and hard work. There are inherent risks involved with investing in the stock market, including the loss of your investment. Past performance in the market is not indicative of future results. Any investment is at your own risk. See Terms of Service here

The available research on day trading suggests that most active traders lose money. Fees and overtrading are major contributors to these losses.

A 2000 study called “Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors” evaluated 66,465 U.S. households that held stocks from 1991 to 1996. The households that traded most averaged an 11.4% annual return during a period where the overall market gained 17.9%. These lower returns were attributed to overconfidence.

A 2014 paper (revised 2019) titled “Learning Fast or Slow?” analyzed the complete transaction history of the Taiwan Stock Exchange between 1992 and 2006. It looked at the ongoing performance of day traders in this sample, and found that 97% of day traders can expect to lose money from trading, and more than 90% of all day trading volume can be traced to investors who predictably lose money. Additionally, it tied the behavior of gamblers and drivers who get more speeding tickets to overtrading, and cited studies showing that legalized gambling has an inverse effect on trading volume.

A 2019 research study (revised 2020) called “Day Trading for a Living?” observed 19,646 Brazilian futures contract traders who started day trading from 2013 to 2015, and recorded two years of their trading activity. The study authors found that 97% of traders with more than 300 days actively trading lost money, and only 1.1% earned more than the Brazilian minimum wage ($16 USD per day). They hypothesized that the greater returns shown in previous studies did not differentiate between frequent day traders and those who traded rarely, and that more frequent trading activity decreases the chance of profitability.

These studies show the wide variance of the available data on day trading profitability. One thing that seems clear from the research is that most day traders lose money .

Millionaire Media 66 W Flagler St. Ste. 900 Miami, FL 33130 United States (888) 878-3621 This is for information purposes only as Millionaire Media LLC nor Timothy Sykes is registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser. No information herein is intended as securities brokerage, investment, tax, accounting or legal advice, as an offer or solicitation of an offer to sell or buy, or as an endorsement, recommendation or sponsorship of any company, security or fund. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes cannot and does not assess, verify or guarantee the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information, the suitability or profitability of any particular investment, or the potential value of any investment or informational source. The reader bears responsibility for his/her own investment research and decisions, should seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before making any investment, and investigate and fully understand any and all risks before investing. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes in no way warrants the solvency, financial condition, or investment advisability of any of the securities mentioned in communications or websites. In addition, Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this information. This information is not intended to be used as the sole basis of any investment decision, nor should it be construed as advice designed to meet the investment needs of any particular investor. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future returns.

Citations for Disclaimer

Barber, Brad M. and Odean, Terrance, Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors. Available at SSRN: “Day Trading for a Living?”

Barber, Brad M. and Lee, Yi-Tsung and Liu, Yu-Jane and Odean, Terrance and Zhang, Ke, Learning Fast or Slow? (May 28, 2019). Forthcoming: Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=2535636”

Chague, Fernando and De-Losso, Rodrigo and Giovannetti, Bruno, Day Trading for a Living? (June 11, 2020). Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=3423101”