timothy sykes logo
ODDITY Tech Stock Jumps After Strong Q2 Beat And Higher Targets Thumbnail
G Google News

ODDITY Tech Stock Jumps After Strong Q2 Beat And Higher Targets

TIM SYKES•UPDATED SEP. 13, 2026, 10:07 AM ET
Reviewed by Bryce Tuoheyand Fact-checked by Matt Monaco

ODDITY Tech Ltd. stocks have been trading up by 15.24 percent following strong earnings and bullish analyst upgrades.

What Traders Need To Know

  • Q2 adjusted EPS of $0.20 beat the $0.12 consensus, with revenue of $180.52M topping $170.65M, powered by SpoiledChild and METHODIQ while IL MAKIAGE faces ad-tech issues.
  • Q3 net revenue is guided to fall about 5% year-on-year, but management sees clear sequential improvement and Q3 adjusted EBITDA of $18–$20M.
  • Morgan Stanley lifted its ODD price target to $16.50 from $10 on recovering growth from SpoiledChild and METHODIQ, while still flagging uncertainty around IL MAKIAGE.
  • Truist and Jefferies both raised price targets to $18 and kept Hold ratings, pointing to strong newer brands but a multi-year drag from IL MAKIAGE, with growth not expected back until FY27.
  • Recent Form 3 and Form 4 filings show changes in insider or major-holder ownership of ODD shares, giving traders another reason to track future ownership disclosures.

Candlestick Chart

Weekly Update Sep 07 – Sep 11, 2026: On Sunday, September 13, 2026 ODDITY Tech Ltd. stock [NASDAQ: ODD] is trending up by 15.24%! Discover the key drivers behind this movement as well as our expert analysis in the detailed breakdown below.

Technology industry expert:

Analyst sentiment – positive

Oddity Tech (ODD) sits in a niche but defensible position at the intersection of beauty and data-driven e-commerce, with $810M revenue and an implied EV/sales of ~2.5x vs. 1.28x P/S, suggesting a modest premium for growth and ROIC quality. A 15.5% pre-tax margin and 30.6% ROIC signal strong unit economics relative to most consumer-tech peers. Leverage is manageable: long-term debt of ~$584M against $402M cash and $397M equity, with low 4% long-term debt-to-capital and ample working capital.

Weekly price action shows an abrupt momentum shift: shares jumped from $13 to a $18.90 high over four sessions, with closes stair-stepping higher, confirming aggressive dip-buying and short-covering. Intraday 5-minute candles show rising volume on breakouts and lighter volume on pullbacks, typical of a trend day structure. The dominant trend is now short-term bullish with an emerging resistance band near $18.50–$19.00. A concrete trading level is $16.50: above it ODD is a buy-on-dips, below it the breakout fails and momentum funds will exit.

Fundamentally, ODD is outperforming typical Tech and Software & IT Services names on earnings surprise and ROIC, though it lacks their recurring revenue visibility. The Q2 EPS beat ($0.20 vs. $0.12) and revenue beat, plus raised targets from Morgan Stanley, Truist, and Jefferies, confirm a credibility inflection, but IL MAKIAGE recovery is pushed to FY27 and Q3 revenue is still guided -5% y/y. Net, I view risk/reward as moderately attractive with near-term support at $16 and resistance at $19–$20; fair value over 6–12 months is $18–$20.

More Breaking News

Quick Financial Overview

ODDITY Tech Ltd. put up a clear earnings beat in Q2 2026. Adjusted EPS came in at $0.20 versus $0.12 expected, and revenue of about $180.5M topped both the $170.65M and $178.2M consensus figures cited. That tells traders the core digital beauty model is still working even as IL MAKIAGE wrestles with technical problems at a key advertising partner.

Full-year revenue of roughly $809.8M, against an enterprise value near $2.02B, lines up with a price-to-sales ratio of about 1.28. For a digital-first beauty play, that is not stretched, especially with a pretax profit margin around 15.5% and strong capital returns (ROIC near 30.55%). Balance sheet quality also matters: roughly $402.2M in cash against $584.4M in long-term debt, plus total equity of about $396.5M, gives ODDITY Tech Ltd. plenty of room to ride out IL MAKIAGE weakness.

On the tape, the reaction has been sharp. The weekly data show ODD running from about $13.00 to a high near $18.90 in a few sessions, with closes stepping up from $13.00 to $18.45. Intraday, one 5‑minute candle captured a violent spike from roughly $16.23 to $20.16 before settling near $18.28, signaling aggressive buying and fast profit-taking. For short-term traders, that sets $16–$16.50 as the first key support zone and the $18.90–$20.00 area as short-term resistance where supply has already shown up.

Conclusion

This is stock news, not investment advice. Timothy Sykes News delivers real-time stock market news focused on key catalysts driving short-term price movements. Our content is tailored for active traders and investors seeking to capitalize on rapid price fluctuations, particularly in volatile sectors like penny stocks. Readers come to us for detailed coverage on earnings reports, mergers, FDA approvals, new contracts, and unusual trading volumes that can trigger significant short-term price action. Some users utilize our news to explain sudden stock movements, while others rely on it for diligent research into potential investment opportunities.

Dive deeper into the world of trading with Timothy Sykes, renowned for his expertise in penny stocks. Explore his top picks and discover the strategies that have propelled him to success with these articles:

Once you’ve got some stocks on watch, elevate your trading game with StocksToTrade the ultimate platform for traders. With specialized tools for swing and day trading, StocksToTrade will guide you through the market’s twists and turns.
Dig into StocksToTrade’s watchlists here:

How much has this post helped you?

(0 votes, average: 0 out of 5)
Leave a reply

* Results are not typical and will vary from person to person. Making money trading stocks takes time, dedication, and hard work. There are inherent risks involved with investing in the stock market, including the loss of your investment. Past performance in the market is not indicative of future results. Any investment is at your own risk. See Terms of Service here

The available research on day trading suggests that most active traders lose money. Fees and overtrading are major contributors to these losses.

A 2000 study called “Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors” evaluated 66,465 U.S. households that held stocks from 1991 to 1996. The households that traded most averaged an 11.4% annual return during a period where the overall market gained 17.9%. These lower returns were attributed to overconfidence.

A 2014 paper (revised 2019) titled “Learning Fast or Slow?” analyzed the complete transaction history of the Taiwan Stock Exchange between 1992 and 2006. It looked at the ongoing performance of day traders in this sample, and found that 97% of day traders can expect to lose money from trading, and more than 90% of all day trading volume can be traced to investors who predictably lose money. Additionally, it tied the behavior of gamblers and drivers who get more speeding tickets to overtrading, and cited studies showing that legalized gambling has an inverse effect on trading volume.

A 2019 research study (revised 2020) called “Day Trading for a Living?” observed 19,646 Brazilian futures contract traders who started day trading from 2013 to 2015, and recorded two years of their trading activity. The study authors found that 97% of traders with more than 300 days actively trading lost money, and only 1.1% earned more than the Brazilian minimum wage ($16 USD per day). They hypothesized that the greater returns shown in previous studies did not differentiate between frequent day traders and those who traded rarely, and that more frequent trading activity decreases the chance of profitability.

These studies show the wide variance of the available data on day trading profitability. One thing that seems clear from the research is that most day traders lose money .

Millionaire Media 66 W Flagler St. Ste. 900 Miami, FL 33130 United States (888) 878-3621 This is for information purposes only as Millionaire Media LLC nor Timothy Sykes is registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser. No information herein is intended as securities brokerage, investment, tax, accounting or legal advice, as an offer or solicitation of an offer to sell or buy, or as an endorsement, recommendation or sponsorship of any company, security or fund. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes cannot and does not assess, verify or guarantee the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information, the suitability or profitability of any particular investment, or the potential value of any investment or informational source. The reader bears responsibility for his/her own investment research and decisions, should seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before making any investment, and investigate and fully understand any and all risks before investing. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes in no way warrants the solvency, financial condition, or investment advisability of any of the securities mentioned in communications or websites. In addition, Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this information. This information is not intended to be used as the sole basis of any investment decision, nor should it be construed as advice designed to meet the investment needs of any particular investor. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future returns.

Citations for Disclaimer

Barber, Brad M. and Odean, Terrance, Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors. Available at SSRN: “Day Trading for a Living?”

Barber, Brad M. and Lee, Yi-Tsung and Liu, Yu-Jane and Odean, Terrance and Zhang, Ke, Learning Fast or Slow? (May 28, 2019). Forthcoming: Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=2535636”

Chague, Fernando and De-Losso, Rodrigo and Giovannetti, Bruno, Day Trading for a Living? (June 11, 2020). Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=3423101”