timothy sykes logo
SMR Stock Slides As Downgrade And Probe Hit Nuclear Hopes Thumbnail
G Google News

SMR Stock Slides As Downgrade And Probe Hit Nuclear Hopes

ELLIS HOBBS•UPDATED SEP. 18, 2026, 4:47 PM ET
Reviewed by Jack Kelloggand Fact-checked by Tim Sykes

NuScale Power Corporation stocks have been trading down by -7.87 percent amid heightened concerns over project delays and financing risks.

Key Takeaways Traders Need To Know

  • UBS downgraded NuScale Power to Sell from Neutral and slashed its price target to $6 from $10, flagging long lead times, weak customer commitments, and heavy cash burn.
  • Shares of SMR dropped more than 13% on volume more than twice the daily average after the UBS downgrade and target cut.
  • NuScale Power holds about $1.9B in cash and investments and is the only SMR developer with NRC design certification, yet still reports minimal revenue and steep losses without binding module orders.
  • Law firm Pomerantz LLP launched a securities‑fraud investigation into NuScale after the UBS‑driven plunge, citing stalled projects in Romania and with TVA and large projected negative free cash flow.
  • While UBS is firmly bearish with a $6 target, the broader Street still sits at an average Hold rating on SMR and a higher mean target around $12.37.

Candlestick Chart

Live Update At 16:46:56 EDT: On Friday, September 18, 2026 NuScale Power Corporation stock [NYSE: SMR] is trending down by -7.87%! Discover the key drivers behind this movement as well as our expert analysis in the detailed breakdown below.

Quick Financial Overview

NuScale Power, trading under the ticker SMR, is acting like a classic story stock: big promise, rough numbers. On the chart, SMR has been bleeding lower. Over the past couple of weeks the stock slipped from the low‑$11s down to roughly $8.27, a sharp pullback that shows traders are re‑pricing risk fast.

Drill into the latest quarter and the gap between hype and reality stands out. NuScale Power generated total revenue of only $75,000, while racking up about $64.1M in expenses and a net loss of roughly $47.5M. That pushed key profitability ratios deep into the red and left SMR with a price‑to‑sales multiple above 300 — extreme territory that assumes a lot of future success.

At the same time, SMR’s balance sheet looks stuffed with cash. The company shows about $766M in cash and over $1.0B in cash and short‑term investments, plus an estimated $1.9B in total cash and investments, and almost no debt. Liquidity ratios are off the charts, with a current ratio near 38, giving NuScale Power a long runway to keep funding operations. For traders, that means dilution and long timelines are real factors, even though bankruptcy risk looks low near term.

More Breaking News

Intraday, SMR’s 5‑minute chart shows a steady grind lower from a $9+ open toward the low‑$8s, then tight consolidation — classic post‑headline digestion as short‑term trading battles play out.

Why Traders Are Laser‑Focused On SMR Now

NuScale Power is suddenly front and center for active traders after a one‑two punch: a harsh analyst downgrade and a fresh legal overhang. UBS cut SMR from Neutral to Sell and slashed its price target to $6 from $10, implying roughly 40% downside from recent levels. The bank cited long project lead times, a lack of firm customer commitments, and substantial expected cash burn. UBS now only assumes a single NuScale Power project even reaches construction in 2028. That is a big reset on the commercialization timeline.

The market listened. Following the downgrade, SMR sank more than 13% in a single session, with trading volume more than double its daily average. That kind of spike in volume tells you this was not casual repositioning — traders were actively dumping or shorting NuScale Power and repricing the whole small‑modular‑reactor story in real time.

Yet the Street is not fully aligned with UBS. Other analysts still sit at an average Hold rating on SMR, with a mean target near $12.37. That split creates a battleground stock. Some traders will see NuScale Power as oversold; others will see a broken narrative.

Underneath the noise, SMR still owns one real edge: NuScale Power is the only SMR developer with a Nuclear Regulatory Commission design certification. The company also sits on that hefty ~$1.9B cash and investments pile. But there are still no binding module orders, just minimal revenue and persistent losses. That gap between regulatory win and commercial traction is exactly what short‑biased traders are leaning on.

The pressure ramped up again when Pomerantz LLP announced a securities‑fraud investigation into NuScale Power after the UBS‑driven slide. The firm highlighted concerns about erosion of SMR’s first‑mover advantage, stalled flagship deals in Romania and with TVA, and large projected negative free cash flow. For traders, that adds headline risk that can flare up any day and keep a lid on SMR bounces.

Conclusion

For active traders, SMR is now a pure sentiment and headline vehicle wrapped around a very long‑dated nuclear build‑out story. On one side, NuScale Power commands real assets: about $1.9B in cash and investments, a clean balance sheet, and a first‑of‑its‑kind NRC‑certified SMR design. On the other, the company’s income statement is a sea of red, with almost no revenue, heavy operating losses, and UBS openly doubting more than one project will start construction before 2028.

That tension is why SMR’s chart has rolled from the $11 area into the mid‑$8s. Every downgrade or legal headline — like the Pomerantz LLP probe into potential securities fraud — gives bears fresh ammo. At the same time, any positive news on firm customer commitments, revived Romania or TVA progress, or new funding partnerships could spark violent short‑covering rallies in NuScale Power.

This is exactly the type of volatile setup that momentum traders on timothysykes.com track closely — but only with strict risk control. As Tim Sykes likes to remind his students, “Cut losses quickly; small losses are part of the game, but big losses are unacceptable.” As millionaire penny stock trader and teacher Tim Sykes, says, “Consistency is key in trading; don’t let emotions dictate your trades.”. Applied to SMR, that means respecting the downtrend, watching volume and key levels, and treating every trade as an educational, research‑driven bet on price action — not a long‑term promise about the future of nuclear power.

This is stock news, not investment advice. Timothy Sykes News delivers real-time stock market news focused on key catalysts driving short-term price movements. Our content is tailored for active traders and investors seeking to capitalize on rapid price fluctuations, particularly in volatile sectors like penny stocks. Readers come to us for detailed coverage on earnings reports, mergers, FDA approvals, new contracts, and unusual trading volumes that can trigger significant short-term price action. Some users utilize our news to explain sudden stock movements, while others rely on it for diligent research into potential investment opportunities.

Dive deeper into the world of trading with Timothy Sykes, renowned for his expertise in penny stocks. Explore his top picks and discover the strategies that have propelled him to success with these articles:

Once you’ve got some stocks on watch, elevate your trading game with StocksToTrade the ultimate platform for traders. With specialized tools for swing and day trading, StocksToTrade will guide you through the market’s twists and turns.
Dig into StocksToTrade’s watchlists here:

How much has this post helped you?

(0 votes, average: 0 out of 5)
Leave a reply

* Results are not typical and will vary from person to person. Making money trading stocks takes time, dedication, and hard work. There are inherent risks involved with investing in the stock market, including the loss of your investment. Past performance in the market is not indicative of future results. Any investment is at your own risk. See Terms of Service here

The available research on day trading suggests that most active traders lose money. Fees and overtrading are major contributors to these losses.

A 2000 study called “Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors” evaluated 66,465 U.S. households that held stocks from 1991 to 1996. The households that traded most averaged an 11.4% annual return during a period where the overall market gained 17.9%. These lower returns were attributed to overconfidence.

A 2014 paper (revised 2019) titled “Learning Fast or Slow?” analyzed the complete transaction history of the Taiwan Stock Exchange between 1992 and 2006. It looked at the ongoing performance of day traders in this sample, and found that 97% of day traders can expect to lose money from trading, and more than 90% of all day trading volume can be traced to investors who predictably lose money. Additionally, it tied the behavior of gamblers and drivers who get more speeding tickets to overtrading, and cited studies showing that legalized gambling has an inverse effect on trading volume.

A 2019 research study (revised 2020) called “Day Trading for a Living?” observed 19,646 Brazilian futures contract traders who started day trading from 2013 to 2015, and recorded two years of their trading activity. The study authors found that 97% of traders with more than 300 days actively trading lost money, and only 1.1% earned more than the Brazilian minimum wage ($16 USD per day). They hypothesized that the greater returns shown in previous studies did not differentiate between frequent day traders and those who traded rarely, and that more frequent trading activity decreases the chance of profitability.

These studies show the wide variance of the available data on day trading profitability. One thing that seems clear from the research is that most day traders lose money .

Millionaire Media 66 W Flagler St. Ste. 900 Miami, FL 33130 United States (888) 878-3621 This is for information purposes only as Millionaire Media LLC nor Timothy Sykes is registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser. No information herein is intended as securities brokerage, investment, tax, accounting or legal advice, as an offer or solicitation of an offer to sell or buy, or as an endorsement, recommendation or sponsorship of any company, security or fund. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes cannot and does not assess, verify or guarantee the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information, the suitability or profitability of any particular investment, or the potential value of any investment or informational source. The reader bears responsibility for his/her own investment research and decisions, should seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before making any investment, and investigate and fully understand any and all risks before investing. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes in no way warrants the solvency, financial condition, or investment advisability of any of the securities mentioned in communications or websites. In addition, Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this information. This information is not intended to be used as the sole basis of any investment decision, nor should it be construed as advice designed to meet the investment needs of any particular investor. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future returns.

Citations for Disclaimer

Barber, Brad M. and Odean, Terrance, Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors. Available at SSRN: “Day Trading for a Living?”

Barber, Brad M. and Lee, Yi-Tsung and Liu, Yu-Jane and Odean, Terrance and Zhang, Ke, Learning Fast or Slow? (May 28, 2019). Forthcoming: Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=2535636”

Chague, Fernando and De-Losso, Rodrigo and Giovannetti, Bruno, Day Trading for a Living? (June 11, 2020). Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=3423101”