timothy sykes logo
SMR Stock Slides As Lawsuits, Fluor Exit Rattle NuScale Power Thumbnail

SMR Stock Slides As Lawsuits, Fluor Exit Rattle NuScale Power

BRYCE TUOHEYUPDATED APR. 28, 2026, 2:33 PM ET
Reviewed by Tim Sykesand Fact-checked by Matt Monaco

NuScale Power Corporation stocks have been trading down by -7.31 percent amid heightened concerns over financing and project viability.

Candlestick Chart

Live Update At 14:32:56 EDT: On Tuesday, April 28, 2026 NuScale Power Corporation stock [NYSE: SMR] is trending down by -7.31%! Discover the key drivers behind this movement as well as our expert analysis in the detailed breakdown below.

Quick Financial Overview

SMR has turned into a volatility machine. Over the last few weeks, NuScale Power has swung from a 2026/04/22 close near $13.57 down to around $11.73 on 2026/04/28. That’s a fast retrace of a sharp bounce, and traders should see it as a failed breakout near-term.

The daily chart shows SMR ripping from the low $9s on 2026/04/10 to the mid-teens by 2026/04/23, then giving back a big chunk of those gains. That kind of round trip usually signals heavy bag holders selling into strength. Intraday, the 5‑minute tape around $11.70–$11.80 is choppy, with tight candles and lower highs from the premarket $12.20s. SMR is clearly in consolidation after a big move.

Fundamentally, NuScale Power is still a pre-scale story. Revenue sits at only about $31.5M, yet the market is valuing the business at more than 130 times sales. Profitability is deep in the red, with profit margins north of ‑1,100% and negative return on equity. The one bright spot: SMR holds about $836M in cash and shows zero debt, plus a solid current ratio near 4.3. For traders, that cash pile gives runway, but the burn is real.

Why Traders Are Watching SMR Now

NuScale Power is in the middle of a storm of its own making, and that’s exactly when active traders start paying attention. SMR is facing a securities-fraud class action that goes right at the core of its story: commercialization of small modular reactors through ENTRA1 Energy. According to multiple complaints, NuScale allegedly overstated ENTRA1’s experience and downplayed the risks around deploying its nuclear modules.

The flash point was Q3 2025. General and administrative expenses exploded over 3,000% to $519M, mainly because of a single $495M payment to ENTRA1 tied to a TVA nuclear development deal. That one line item helped drive a brutal $532M quarterly net loss. The market reacted fast. SMR dropped nearly 20% on the disclosure and ultimately slid more than 70% from highs above $57 to roughly $17 during the class period.

For momentum traders, that’s the textbook definition of a broken story. NuScale Power now carries legal overhang, questions about capital allocation, and doubts about management’s judgment in choosing and funding ENTRA1, which reportedly lacked real nuclear project experience. Add Fluor’s full exit from roughly 40M shares—about $2.43B in open‑market sales since 2025/09—and you have a major strategic backer walking away.

Layer on Citi’s cut of its SMR price target from $11.50 to $9, with a reiterated Sell rating, and the sell‑side is clearly lining up on the cautious side. Put all of this together and SMR becomes a prime candidate for event‑driven trading: lawsuit headlines, analyst notes, or any update on TVA milestones can spark sharp moves both directions.

More Breaking News

Conclusion

NuScale Power and SMR are at a critical stage. On one hand, the company has a big cash cushion, no debt, and a long‑term vision in modular nuclear that still excites a lot of traders. On the other, the numbers and the news around ENTRA1 and the TVA agreement show heavy cash burn, a $495M bet that produced a $532M quarterly loss, and legal claims that management misled the market about a key partner.

Technically, SMR is stuck between that prior ramp from single digits and fresh resistance in the low‑teens. With Fluor gone, Citi on Sell, and multiple class actions pointing at the same story, the burden of proof is now on NuScale Power to rebuild trust. Until then, SMR trades more like a litigation and sentiment vehicle than a clean fundamental swing.

For active traders, this is where discipline matters most. As Tim Sykes likes to say, “Volatility is opportunity, but only if you respect risk and cut losses quickly.” As millionaire penny stock trader and teacher Tim Sykes says, “You must adapt to the market; the market will not adapt to you.”. SMR gives plenty of volatility. The job now is to treat NuScale Power as a trading vehicle, not a hope story—plan your levels, watch the headlines, and let the price action confirm before you step in. This article is for educational and research purposes only and is not investment advice.

This is stock news, not investment advice. Timothy Sykes News delivers real-time stock market news focused on key catalysts driving short-term price movements. Our content is tailored for active traders and investors seeking to capitalize on rapid price fluctuations, particularly in volatile sectors like penny stocks. Readers come to us for detailed coverage on earnings reports, mergers, FDA approvals, new contracts, and unusual trading volumes that can trigger significant short-term price action. Some users utilize our news to explain sudden stock movements, while others rely on it for diligent research into potential investment opportunities.

Dive deeper into the world of trading with Timothy Sykes, renowned for his expertise in penny stocks. Explore his top picks and discover the strategies that have propelled him to success with these articles:

Once you’ve got some stocks on watch, elevate your trading game with StocksToTrade the ultimate platform for traders. With specialized tools for swing and day trading, StocksToTrade will guide you through the market’s twists and turns.
Dig into StocksToTrade’s watchlists here:



How much has this post helped you?


Leave a reply

* Results are not typical and will vary from person to person. Making money trading stocks takes time, dedication, and hard work. There are inherent risks involved with investing in the stock market, including the loss of your investment. Past performance in the market is not indicative of future results. Any investment is at your own risk. See Terms of Service here

The available research on day trading suggests that most active traders lose money. Fees and overtrading are major contributors to these losses.

A 2000 study called “Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors” evaluated 66,465 U.S. households that held stocks from 1991 to 1996. The households that traded most averaged an 11.4% annual return during a period where the overall market gained 17.9%. These lower returns were attributed to overconfidence.

A 2014 paper (revised 2019) titled “Learning Fast or Slow?” analyzed the complete transaction history of the Taiwan Stock Exchange between 1992 and 2006. It looked at the ongoing performance of day traders in this sample, and found that 97% of day traders can expect to lose money from trading, and more than 90% of all day trading volume can be traced to investors who predictably lose money. Additionally, it tied the behavior of gamblers and drivers who get more speeding tickets to overtrading, and cited studies showing that legalized gambling has an inverse effect on trading volume.

A 2019 research study (revised 2020) called “Day Trading for a Living?” observed 19,646 Brazilian futures contract traders who started day trading from 2013 to 2015, and recorded two years of their trading activity. The study authors found that 97% of traders with more than 300 days actively trading lost money, and only 1.1% earned more than the Brazilian minimum wage ($16 USD per day). They hypothesized that the greater returns shown in previous studies did not differentiate between frequent day traders and those who traded rarely, and that more frequent trading activity decreases the chance of profitability.

These studies show the wide variance of the available data on day trading profitability. One thing that seems clear from the research is that most day traders lose money .

Millionaire Media 66 W Flagler St. Ste. 900 Miami, FL 33130 United States (888) 878-3621 This is for information purposes only as Millionaire Media LLC nor Timothy Sykes is registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser. No information herein is intended as securities brokerage, investment, tax, accounting or legal advice, as an offer or solicitation of an offer to sell or buy, or as an endorsement, recommendation or sponsorship of any company, security or fund. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes cannot and does not assess, verify or guarantee the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information, the suitability or profitability of any particular investment, or the potential value of any investment or informational source. The reader bears responsibility for his/her own investment research and decisions, should seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before making any investment, and investigate and fully understand any and all risks before investing. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes in no way warrants the solvency, financial condition, or investment advisability of any of the securities mentioned in communications or websites. In addition, Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this information. This information is not intended to be used as the sole basis of any investment decision, nor should it be construed as advice designed to meet the investment needs of any particular investor. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future returns.

Citations for Disclaimer

Barber, Brad M. and Odean, Terrance, Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors. Available at SSRN: “Day Trading for a Living?”

Barber, Brad M. and Lee, Yi-Tsung and Liu, Yu-Jane and Odean, Terrance and Zhang, Ke, Learning Fast or Slow? (May 28, 2019). Forthcoming: Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=2535636”

Chague, Fernando and De-Losso, Rodrigo and Giovannetti, Bruno, Day Trading for a Living? (June 11, 2020). Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=3423101”