timothy sykes logo
LAC Stock Slips As Scotiabank Slashes Price Target Thumbnail

LAC Stock Slips As Scotiabank Slashes Price Target

JACK KELLOGGUPDATED APR. 28, 2026, 11:32 AM ET
Reviewed by Ellis Hobbsand Fact-checked by Matt Monaco

Lithium Americas Corp. stocks have been trading down by -7.43 percent amid heightened concerns over project delays and regulatory hurdles.

Candlestick Chart

Live Update At 11:32:23 EDT: On Tuesday, April 28, 2026 Lithium Americas Corp. stock [NYSE: LAC] is trending down by -7.43%! Discover the key drivers behind this movement as well as our expert analysis in the detailed breakdown below.

Quick Financial Overview

Lithium Americas Corp. has been trading like a classic battleground story. LAC is sitting in the mid-$4 range after a recent push off lows near $4. On 2026/04/28, the stock opened around $5.05 and closed at $4.86, giving back early gains and showing sellers are still active above $5.

Zoom out over the past few weeks and LAC shows a steady grind higher from $4.03 on 2026/04/06 to recent closes around $4.80–$5.25 before this latest pullback. That’s a strong percentage move, but every attempt to hold over $5 has been faded. For short-term traders, that $5–$5.30 band is turning into clear resistance.

Intraday, LAC’s 5‑minute chart shows heavy premarket trading above $5, followed by a sharp drop right off the 09:30 open from $5.07 down into the high $4s. The rest of the morning is a chop zone between roughly $4.75 and $4.90. That kind of action tells traders there’s liquidity, but no clear trend intraday — a day-trading playground only if you respect your risk.

Fundamentally, LAC is still pre‑revenue, burning cash to build Thacker Pass. Key ratios show a weak current ratio around 0.3 and negative returns on equity. This is a capital‑hungry story that depends on external funding and execution.

Why Traders Are Watching LAC After The Target Cut

The Scotiabank call matters for LAC because it hits the stock right where the story is most fragile — project costs and share dilution. By taking the price target down from $7 to $5 while keeping a Sector Perform rating, the bank is basically telling traders that Lithium Americas Corp. might still survive and execute, but the easy upside is gone for now.

For LAC, Thacker Pass Phase 1 is everything. When a major shop highlights “higher inflation risk” at that project, it’s a shot across the bow. Higher inflation means concrete, steel, labor, and equipment all cost more. For a project‑stage miner like Lithium Americas Corp., that often turns into bigger capex budgets, stretched timelines, and the need to raise more cash.

That’s where the second warning hits. Scotiabank called out the potential for more dilution from at‑the‑market share issuance. LAC already relies on the equity markets to fund development. If the company keeps tapping the ATM, every new share sold spreads future upside across a larger base. Traders in Lithium Americas Corp. now have to assume their slice of the pie may keep shrinking.

Yet the chart shows LAC still attracts momentum. Big premarket volume above $5 and repeated spikes from the low $4s tell you traders are willing to speculate on lithium and the long‑term EV story. The new $5 target, though, almost sits right on top of where LAC has been failing lately. That makes the $5 level even more important technically — it’s now both chart resistance and the anchor for a major analyst’s fair‑value view.

More Breaking News

Conclusion

For active traders, LAC is a pure “know your risk” setup. Lithium Americas Corp. has a flagship asset, a big macro tailwind from EV demand, and a chart that can move 10%–15% in a day. But the Scotiabank cut from $7 to $5 is a reminder that execution and financing risk are front and center. Higher expected costs at Thacker Pass Phase 1 and the threat of more at‑the‑market issuance put a cap on near‑term enthusiasm.

The balance sheet backs up that caution. LAC shows negative working capital, a current ratio well below 1, and large capital spending needs. Cash of roughly $61M against a $1.10B asset base tells traders Lithium Americas Corp. will likely keep depending on markets to fund progress. That’s exactly the scenario where dilution becomes a recurring headline.

From a trading standpoint, LAC’s key battleground is clear. Buyers keep stepping in near $4, while sellers defend the $5–$5.30 area. With Scotiabank’s new target pinned at $5, that zone becomes the line in the sand for swing traders watching Lithium Americas Corp.

As Tim Sykes loves to say, “The market doesn’t care about your opinion, only your risk management.” As millionaire penny stock trader and teacher Tim Sykes, says, “Consistency is key in trading; don’t let emotions dictate your trades.”. With LAC, that means respecting the dilution risk, watching the $5 level like a hawk, and cutting losses fast if the thesis breaks. This breakdown is for educational and research purposes only, but the discipline it demands is very real.

This is stock news, not investment advice. Timothy Sykes News delivers real-time stock market news focused on key catalysts driving short-term price movements. Our content is tailored for active traders and investors seeking to capitalize on rapid price fluctuations, particularly in volatile sectors like penny stocks. Readers come to us for detailed coverage on earnings reports, mergers, FDA approvals, new contracts, and unusual trading volumes that can trigger significant short-term price action. Some users utilize our news to explain sudden stock movements, while others rely on it for diligent research into potential investment opportunities.

Dive deeper into the world of trading with Timothy Sykes, renowned for his expertise in penny stocks. Explore his top picks and discover the strategies that have propelled him to success with these articles:

Once you’ve got some stocks on watch, elevate your trading game with StocksToTrade the ultimate platform for traders. With specialized tools for swing and day trading, StocksToTrade will guide you through the market’s twists and turns.
Dig into StocksToTrade’s watchlists here:



How much has this post helped you?


Leave a reply

* Results are not typical and will vary from person to person. Making money trading stocks takes time, dedication, and hard work. There are inherent risks involved with investing in the stock market, including the loss of your investment. Past performance in the market is not indicative of future results. Any investment is at your own risk. See Terms of Service here

The available research on day trading suggests that most active traders lose money. Fees and overtrading are major contributors to these losses.

A 2000 study called “Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors” evaluated 66,465 U.S. households that held stocks from 1991 to 1996. The households that traded most averaged an 11.4% annual return during a period where the overall market gained 17.9%. These lower returns were attributed to overconfidence.

A 2014 paper (revised 2019) titled “Learning Fast or Slow?” analyzed the complete transaction history of the Taiwan Stock Exchange between 1992 and 2006. It looked at the ongoing performance of day traders in this sample, and found that 97% of day traders can expect to lose money from trading, and more than 90% of all day trading volume can be traced to investors who predictably lose money. Additionally, it tied the behavior of gamblers and drivers who get more speeding tickets to overtrading, and cited studies showing that legalized gambling has an inverse effect on trading volume.

A 2019 research study (revised 2020) called “Day Trading for a Living?” observed 19,646 Brazilian futures contract traders who started day trading from 2013 to 2015, and recorded two years of their trading activity. The study authors found that 97% of traders with more than 300 days actively trading lost money, and only 1.1% earned more than the Brazilian minimum wage ($16 USD per day). They hypothesized that the greater returns shown in previous studies did not differentiate between frequent day traders and those who traded rarely, and that more frequent trading activity decreases the chance of profitability.

These studies show the wide variance of the available data on day trading profitability. One thing that seems clear from the research is that most day traders lose money .

Millionaire Media 66 W Flagler St. Ste. 900 Miami, FL 33130 United States (888) 878-3621 This is for information purposes only as Millionaire Media LLC nor Timothy Sykes is registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser. No information herein is intended as securities brokerage, investment, tax, accounting or legal advice, as an offer or solicitation of an offer to sell or buy, or as an endorsement, recommendation or sponsorship of any company, security or fund. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes cannot and does not assess, verify or guarantee the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information, the suitability or profitability of any particular investment, or the potential value of any investment or informational source. The reader bears responsibility for his/her own investment research and decisions, should seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before making any investment, and investigate and fully understand any and all risks before investing. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes in no way warrants the solvency, financial condition, or investment advisability of any of the securities mentioned in communications or websites. In addition, Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this information. This information is not intended to be used as the sole basis of any investment decision, nor should it be construed as advice designed to meet the investment needs of any particular investor. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future returns.

Citations for Disclaimer

Barber, Brad M. and Odean, Terrance, Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors. Available at SSRN: “Day Trading for a Living?”

Barber, Brad M. and Lee, Yi-Tsung and Liu, Yu-Jane and Odean, Terrance and Zhang, Ke, Learning Fast or Slow? (May 28, 2019). Forthcoming: Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=2535636”

Chague, Fernando and De-Losso, Rodrigo and Giovannetti, Bruno, Day Trading for a Living? (June 11, 2020). Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=3423101”