timothy sykes logo
INM Stock Jumps As Amended Mentari Merger Takes Shape Thumbnail

INM Stock Jumps As Amended Mentari Merger Takes Shape

TIM SYKESUPDATED JUL. 22, 2026, 9:18 AM ET
Reviewed by Bryce Tuoheyand Fact-checked by Matt Monaco

InMed Pharmaceuticals Inc. stocks have been trading up by 35.77 percent amid heightened optimism from recent biotech advancement headlines.

Key Takeaways Traders Need On INM

  • Amended all-stock merger deal with Mentari Therapeutics moves InMed Pharmaceuticals one step further along its strategic roadmap.
  • New language tightens how pre-closing financing will change the INM–Mentari share-exchange ratio, a key factor for dilution and upside.
  • Transaction sequencing and intended tax treatment are now more clearly laid out, reducing structural uncertainty for longer-term traders.
  • Boards of both companies have approved the merger, with closing targeted for Q4 2026, pending SEC effectiveness and shareholder votes.

Candlestick Chart

Live Update At 09:18:10 EDT: On Wednesday, July 22, 2026 InMed Pharmaceuticals Inc. stock [NASDAQ: INM] is trending up by 35.77%! Discover the key drivers behind this movement as well as our expert analysis in the detailed breakdown below.

Quick Financial Overview

INM is trading like a classic low-float biotech with news-driven spikes. On the daily chart, INM has been grinding in a tight band, mostly between $1.50 and $1.67 over recent weeks. That slow range says many traders were in “wait and see” mode before this latest merger update.

Intraday, it is a different story. The 5‑minute data shows INM blasting from under $2 to as high as $5.53 at the open, then washing out hard and settling back in the $2–$3 zone. That’s extreme volatility, pure and simple. For short-term traders, INM has turned into a momentum playground where level discipline and hard stops matter.

Fundamentally, INM is still a development-stage biotech. Revenue is just under $5M, but the company is running deep losses, with operating margins sharply negative and free cash flow around -$1.70M in the latest quarter. The flip side: INM shows a strong current ratio near 3.1, low debt, and price-to-book around 0.29, signaling a balance sheet that is not overleveraged. For traders, that combination — high burn, clean balance sheet, and merger optionality — often fuels news-driven squeezes.

Why Traders Are Watching The INM–Mentari Deal

Traders are locked on INM right now because the story has shifted from simple “spec biotech” to a live merger narrative. InMed Pharmaceuticals amended its previously announced all-stock merger agreement with privately held Mentari Therapeutics and filed a Form S‑4 registration statement and preliminary proxy/prospectus with the SEC. That filing is a key procedural step. It signals the deal is real enough that both sides are willing to lay it out in detail for regulators and shareholders.

The amended INM agreement does not change the headline — it sharpens the mechanics. Management clarified how the transaction will sequence, how any pre‑closing financing will affect the exchange ratio, and what tax treatment they are targeting. For active traders, those tweaks matter. Pre‑closing raises can be a double-edged sword: they keep the combined company funded, but they also change how much of the post‑deal pie current INM holders control.

Board approval from both InMed Pharmaceuticals and Mentari gives the merger political backing inside each company. But the closing target in Q4 2026 tells traders this is a long runway story. Between now and then, every S‑4 update, every financing, and every data headline from either side can swing INM sharply.

This is why the intraday tape has been so wild. The stock ripped on the merger narrative and then gave back a big chunk as day traders locked in gains. INM has turned into one of those names where you do not marry the stock — you trade the volatility and respect the risk, especially with heavy losses still on the income statement.

Conclusion

For traders studying INM, the main takeaway is simple: this is now a complex merger trade, not just a chart trade. InMed Pharmaceuticals has pushed the Mentari transaction forward by amending the all‑stock agreement and getting the Form S‑4 and preliminary proxy/prospectus on file. Clarifying transaction sequencing, exchange‑ratio impacts from any pre‑closing financing, and intended tax treatment removes some unknowns from the structure, but it also puts dilution and deal math front and center.

Financially, INM remains a small, loss‑making biotech with modest revenue and a relatively clean balance sheet. That profile, paired with the Q4 2026 closing horizon, means the stock is likely to stay news-driven. Day by day, INM will trade more on headlines, filings, and sentiment than on trailing earnings.

Traders in the Tim Sykes community focus on exactly this kind of setup: volatile, story-rich, and crowded with short-term players. As Tim Sykes likes to say, “The market doesn’t care about your opinion, only about price action and your ability to adapt.” As millionaire penny stock trader and teacher Tim Sykes, says, “Embrace the journey, the ups and downs; each mistake is a lesson to improve your strategy.”. With INM, that means mapping key levels, reacting, and cutting losses fast if the merger narrative turns or fresh financing pressures the stock.

This article is for educational and research purposes only and is not investment advice.

This is stock news, not investment advice. Timothy Sykes News delivers real-time stock market news focused on key catalysts driving short-term price movements. Our content is tailored for active traders and investors seeking to capitalize on rapid price fluctuations, particularly in volatile sectors like penny stocks. Readers come to us for detailed coverage on earnings reports, mergers, FDA approvals, new contracts, and unusual trading volumes that can trigger significant short-term price action. Some users utilize our news to explain sudden stock movements, while others rely on it for diligent research into potential investment opportunities.

Dive deeper into the world of trading with Timothy Sykes, renowned for his expertise in penny stocks. Explore his top picks and discover the strategies that have propelled him to success with these articles:

Once you’ve got some stocks on watch, elevate your trading game with StocksToTrade the ultimate platform for traders. With specialized tools for swing and day trading, StocksToTrade will guide you through the market’s twists and turns.
Dig into StocksToTrade’s watchlists here:


How much has this post helped you?



Leave a reply

* Results are not typical and will vary from person to person. Making money trading stocks takes time, dedication, and hard work. There are inherent risks involved with investing in the stock market, including the loss of your investment. Past performance in the market is not indicative of future results. Any investment is at your own risk. See Terms of Service here

The available research on day trading suggests that most active traders lose money. Fees and overtrading are major contributors to these losses.

A 2000 study called “Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors” evaluated 66,465 U.S. households that held stocks from 1991 to 1996. The households that traded most averaged an 11.4% annual return during a period where the overall market gained 17.9%. These lower returns were attributed to overconfidence.

A 2014 paper (revised 2019) titled “Learning Fast or Slow?” analyzed the complete transaction history of the Taiwan Stock Exchange between 1992 and 2006. It looked at the ongoing performance of day traders in this sample, and found that 97% of day traders can expect to lose money from trading, and more than 90% of all day trading volume can be traced to investors who predictably lose money. Additionally, it tied the behavior of gamblers and drivers who get more speeding tickets to overtrading, and cited studies showing that legalized gambling has an inverse effect on trading volume.

A 2019 research study (revised 2020) called “Day Trading for a Living?” observed 19,646 Brazilian futures contract traders who started day trading from 2013 to 2015, and recorded two years of their trading activity. The study authors found that 97% of traders with more than 300 days actively trading lost money, and only 1.1% earned more than the Brazilian minimum wage ($16 USD per day). They hypothesized that the greater returns shown in previous studies did not differentiate between frequent day traders and those who traded rarely, and that more frequent trading activity decreases the chance of profitability.

These studies show the wide variance of the available data on day trading profitability. One thing that seems clear from the research is that most day traders lose money .

Millionaire Media 66 W Flagler St. Ste. 900 Miami, FL 33130 United States (888) 878-3621 This is for information purposes only as Millionaire Media LLC nor Timothy Sykes is registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser. No information herein is intended as securities brokerage, investment, tax, accounting or legal advice, as an offer or solicitation of an offer to sell or buy, or as an endorsement, recommendation or sponsorship of any company, security or fund. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes cannot and does not assess, verify or guarantee the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information, the suitability or profitability of any particular investment, or the potential value of any investment or informational source. The reader bears responsibility for his/her own investment research and decisions, should seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before making any investment, and investigate and fully understand any and all risks before investing. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes in no way warrants the solvency, financial condition, or investment advisability of any of the securities mentioned in communications or websites. In addition, Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this information. This information is not intended to be used as the sole basis of any investment decision, nor should it be construed as advice designed to meet the investment needs of any particular investor. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future returns.

Citations for Disclaimer

Barber, Brad M. and Odean, Terrance, Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors. Available at SSRN: “Day Trading for a Living?”

Barber, Brad M. and Lee, Yi-Tsung and Liu, Yu-Jane and Odean, Terrance and Zhang, Ke, Learning Fast or Slow? (May 28, 2019). Forthcoming: Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=2535636”

Chague, Fernando and De-Losso, Rodrigo and Giovannetti, Bruno, Day Trading for a Living? (June 11, 2020). Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=3423101”