timothy sykes logo
GME Jumps As Ryan Cohen Share Buy Fuels Volatile Outlook Thumbnail

GME Jumps As Ryan Cohen Share Buy Fuels Volatile Outlook

JACK KELLOGG•UPDATED SEP. 25, 2026, 4:39 PM ET
Reviewed by Tim Sykesand Fact-checked by Ellis Hobbs

GameStop Corporation stocks have been trading down by -6.32 percent amid renewed short-seller pressure and weakening retail investor enthusiasm.

What Traders Need To Know

  • CEO Ryan Cohen bought about 1.15 million GME shares around $22.94, sparking a more than 3% bounce and lifting short-term sentiment.
  • Q2 adjusted EPS edged up to $0.27 from $0.25, but revenue dropped about 19% year over year to $790.2M, only slightly ahead of expectations.
  • Management guided Q2 revenue to $780M-$800M, well below last year’s $972.2M, while the cash and securities pile fell to roughly $5.05B-$5.07B from $8.69B.
  • The company is exchanging and cancelling about $1.4B of 0% convertible notes, issuing roughly 55.5M new shares plus $358.4M cash and leaving about $2.8B of convertibles outstanding.
  • Preliminary Q2 results show stronger reported income largely tied to a nearly $5B eBay stake rather than core retail, raising questions about earnings quality.

Candlestick Chart

Weekly Update Sep 21 – Sep 25, 2026: On Friday, September 25, 2026 GameStop Corporation stock [NYSE: GME] is trending down by -6.32%! Discover the key drivers behind this movement as well as our expert analysis in the detailed breakdown below.

Consumer Discretionary industry expert:

Analyst sentiment – negative

GameStop sits in a shrinking legacy niche, with five‑year revenue CAGR of roughly ‑7% and three‑year at ‑14%, well below Consumer Discretionary and Retail‑Discretionary benchmarks that are modestly positive. However, gross margin at 34% and EBIT margin near 15% are solid, aided by investment gains and cost rationalization, not core retail strength. Balance sheet liquidity is extraordinary (current ratio 12.4x, quick 9.8x, ~$4.9B cash) but ROA ~1–2% and asset turnover 0.4x indicate capital inefficiency.

Technically, GME’s weekly tape shows a short‑term uptrend off the CEO purchase catalyst: price moved from ~$22.8 to an intrawork high above $25 before fading back toward $23.5, reflecting aggressive selling into strength. Intraday 5‑minute candles highlight elevated volume and repeated rejection in the $24.80–25.00 zone, establishing that band as near‑term resistance. The actionable level is $23.00: a sustained break and close below it would likely trigger momentum selling toward the high‑teens.

Fundamentally, Q2 EPS of $0.27 masks revenue decline of ~19% and heavy reliance on eBay‑related gains and financial engineering, while the proposed eBay acquisition path and $1.4B convert exchange introduce material execution and dilution risk, with $2.8B converts still outstanding. Structurally, GameStop remains disadvantaged versus digital‑first peers and platforms like Steam, and sector competition is intensifying. Verdict: Negative risk‑reward; resistance $25–26, key support $20, with skew toward a retest of sub‑$20 levels.

Quick Financial Overview

GameStop Corporation just printed an unusual mix of stabilizing earnings and shrinking sales. Q2 adjusted EPS came in at $0.27 versus $0.25 a year ago, matching analyst expectations, while total revenue slid to $790.2M from $972.2M. The drop is tied to last year’s Nintendo Switch 2 launch boost, planned store closures, and the sale of France operations. For traders, the story is that GameStop Corporation can still defend near-term profitability, but it is doing so on a smaller base of business.

Under the hood, margins and balance sheet strength stand out. Reported EBIT margin sits near 14.6%, with gross margin at 34.4%, solid numbers for a challenged retailer. Valuation metrics like a price-to-sales ratio of 3.27 and a P/E around 17.5 imply the market is already pricing in some turnaround or optionality. At the same time, a current ratio above 12 and quick ratio near 9.8 point to significant liquidity, even after cash and marketable securities fell to a little over $5B from $8.69B.

On the tape, GME is trading in the mid-$20s, with the latest weekly closes oscillating between roughly $23.4 and $24.9. Intraday, the stock showed a fade from premarket around $25 into the low-$23s by the close, with multiple failed pushes above $24.5. That action signals overhead supply and active selling into strength. For short-term traders, GameStop Corporation currently trades like a range-bound, headline-driven name where liquidity is deep enough for tactical entries, but follow-through remains uncertain.

Conclusion

This is stock news, not investment advice. Timothy Sykes News delivers real-time stock market news focused on key catalysts driving short-term price movements. Our content is tailored for active traders and investors seeking to capitalize on rapid price fluctuations, particularly in volatile sectors like penny stocks. Readers come to us for detailed coverage on earnings reports, mergers, FDA approvals, new contracts, and unusual trading volumes that can trigger significant short-term price action. Some users utilize our news to explain sudden stock movements, while others rely on it for diligent research into potential investment opportunities.

Dive deeper into the world of trading with Timothy Sykes, renowned for his expertise in penny stocks. Explore his top picks and discover the strategies that have propelled him to success with these articles:

Once you’ve got some stocks on watch, elevate your trading game with StocksToTrade the ultimate platform for traders. With specialized tools for swing and day trading, StocksToTrade will guide you through the market’s twists and turns.
Dig into StocksToTrade’s watchlists here:


How much has this post helped you?



Leave a reply

* Results are not typical and will vary from person to person. Making money trading stocks takes time, dedication, and hard work. There are inherent risks involved with investing in the stock market, including the loss of your investment. Past performance in the market is not indicative of future results. Any investment is at your own risk. See Terms of Service here

The available research on day trading suggests that most active traders lose money. Fees and overtrading are major contributors to these losses.

A 2000 study called “Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors” evaluated 66,465 U.S. households that held stocks from 1991 to 1996. The households that traded most averaged an 11.4% annual return during a period where the overall market gained 17.9%. These lower returns were attributed to overconfidence.

A 2014 paper (revised 2019) titled “Learning Fast or Slow?” analyzed the complete transaction history of the Taiwan Stock Exchange between 1992 and 2006. It looked at the ongoing performance of day traders in this sample, and found that 97% of day traders can expect to lose money from trading, and more than 90% of all day trading volume can be traced to investors who predictably lose money. Additionally, it tied the behavior of gamblers and drivers who get more speeding tickets to overtrading, and cited studies showing that legalized gambling has an inverse effect on trading volume.

A 2019 research study (revised 2020) called “Day Trading for a Living?” observed 19,646 Brazilian futures contract traders who started day trading from 2013 to 2015, and recorded two years of their trading activity. The study authors found that 97% of traders with more than 300 days actively trading lost money, and only 1.1% earned more than the Brazilian minimum wage ($16 USD per day). They hypothesized that the greater returns shown in previous studies did not differentiate between frequent day traders and those who traded rarely, and that more frequent trading activity decreases the chance of profitability.

These studies show the wide variance of the available data on day trading profitability. One thing that seems clear from the research is that most day traders lose money .

Millionaire Media 66 W Flagler St. Ste. 900 Miami, FL 33130 United States (888) 878-3621 This is for information purposes only as Millionaire Media LLC nor Timothy Sykes is registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser. No information herein is intended as securities brokerage, investment, tax, accounting or legal advice, as an offer or solicitation of an offer to sell or buy, or as an endorsement, recommendation or sponsorship of any company, security or fund. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes cannot and does not assess, verify or guarantee the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information, the suitability or profitability of any particular investment, or the potential value of any investment or informational source. The reader bears responsibility for his/her own investment research and decisions, should seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before making any investment, and investigate and fully understand any and all risks before investing. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes in no way warrants the solvency, financial condition, or investment advisability of any of the securities mentioned in communications or websites. In addition, Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this information. This information is not intended to be used as the sole basis of any investment decision, nor should it be construed as advice designed to meet the investment needs of any particular investor. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future returns.

Citations for Disclaimer

Barber, Brad M. and Odean, Terrance, Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors. Available at SSRN: “Day Trading for a Living?”

Barber, Brad M. and Lee, Yi-Tsung and Liu, Yu-Jane and Odean, Terrance and Zhang, Ke, Learning Fast or Slow? (May 28, 2019). Forthcoming: Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=2535636”

Chague, Fernando and De-Losso, Rodrigo and Giovannetti, Bruno, Day Trading for a Living? (June 11, 2020). Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=3423101”