timothy sykes logo

Stock News

Fannie Mae Faces Scrutiny Under Alleged Misconduct by Federal Housing Leaders

Matt MonacoAvatar
Written by Matt Monaco Reviewed by Jack Kellogg Fact-checked by Tim Sykes
Updated 11/21/2025, 11:33 am ET 11/21/2025, 11:33 am ET | 5 min 5 min read
Fannie Mae Faces Scrutiny Under Alleged Misconduct by Federal Housing Leaders Thumbnail

Federal National Mortgage Association stocks have been trading down by -8.1 percent amid market unease and economic uncertainties.

Candlestick Chart

Live Update At 11:32:41 EST: On Friday, November 21, 2025 Federal National Mortgage Association stock [NASDAQ: FNMA] is trending down by -8.1%! Discover the key drivers behind this movement as well as our expert analysis in the detailed breakdown below.

Quick Financial Overview

The Federal National Mortgage Association, better known as Fannie Mae, recently reported key earnings and financial metrics that offer a glimpse into its financial health and market strategy. Revenue for a recent period reached $30.85 billion, signaling significant operational scale. However, the price-to-sales ratio stands at a low 0.45, which indicates potential undervaluation in the market. Nevertheless, the price-to-free cash flow is a minimal 0.3, which can be considered impressive given the asset-heavy nature of the business.

Despite the robust revenue, profitability metrics paint a mixed picture. The gross margin is not specified, and the pretax profit margin stands high at 71.8%, showcasing efficient cost management. Yet, the return on assets is negative (-0.05%), hinting at inefficiencies in asset utilization. The return on equity fairs slightly better at 0.02%, though still not indicating significant shareholder value creation.

Fannie Mae’s balance sheet reveals a total asset valuation of approximately $4.34 trillion. With $43.36 billion in total capitalization and a staggering $4.23 trillion in total liabilities, the organization’s debt management strategies are of considerable interest. The current leverage ratio hovers around 50.2, reflecting significant financial obligations.

These data points reflect both operational strength and areas requiring strategic attention. As earnings details unfold, the market will await to see how Fannie Mae tackles these complexities amid ongoing external scrutiny.

Impacts of Current Developments

The spotlight is on Fannie Mae amid recent allegations of misconduct within the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). The scrutiny comes with inquiries into potential violation of privacy norms regarding mortgage records. This raises significant concerns, specifically regarding the assurance and security of client data within the housing finance organization.

The allegations against Director Bill Pulte and unnamed senior officials in FHFA could have considerable market repercussions. Investors are keenly watching how these concerns get addressed, as the situation could influence the broader operational landscape of Fannie Mae. Meanwhile, the potential for reputational damage looms unless timely clarifications and resolutions are pursued.

Financial stability in the housing sector is critical, and any perceived threat, no matter the veracity, can induce uncertainty. Analysts predict a potential impact on Fannie Mae’s market standing, considering that such scrutiny may instigate increased regulatory oversight or policy revisions.

Further materialization of these investigations might necessitate resource allocation shifts within Fannie Mae to ensure compliance and restore confidence among stakeholders and regulatory bodies. The company may also face operational hurdles as it navigates through these lapses, emphasizing the pivotal role leadership and governance play in maintaining institutional integrity.

More Breaking News

Conclusion

As the Federal National Mortgage Association contends with the potential ramifications of the current allegations, the focus will be on effective resolution strategies. Balancing internal oversight enhancements with transparent public communications will be essential in navigating this tide. The evolving narrative will have short-term market implications while also setting precedents for its future operational policies. Fannie Mae’s response will serve as a significant indicator to traders, clients, and regulators on the robustness of its governance frameworks in shielding its operations from lapses that threaten its market position. As millionaire penny stock trader and teacher Tim Sykes says, “It’s better to go home at zero than to go home in the red.” In the world of trading, this adage underscores the importance of resilience and calculated responses in volatile situations. In the subsequent days and weeks, it is the chain of responses from Fannie Mae and related governing bodies that will determine the ultimate financial and reputational impact of these revelations.

This is stock news, not investment advice. Timothy Sykes News delivers real-time stock market news focused on key catalysts driving short-term price movements. Our content is tailored for active traders and investors seeking to capitalize on rapid price fluctuations, particularly in volatile sectors like penny stocks. Readers come to us for detailed coverage on earnings reports, mergers, FDA approvals, new contracts, and unusual trading volumes that can trigger significant short-term price action. Some users utilize our news to explain sudden stock movements, while others rely on it for diligent research into potential investment opportunities.

Dive deeper into the world of trading with Timothy Sykes, renowned for his expertise in penny stocks. Explore his top picks and discover the strategies that have propelled him to success with these articles:

Once you’ve got some stocks on watch, elevate your trading game with StocksToTrade the ultimate platform for traders. With specialized tools for swing and day trading, StocksToTrade will guide you through the market’s twists and turns.
Dig into StocksToTrade’s watchlists here:

How much has this post helped you?

(0 votes, average: 0 out of 5)
Leave a reply
Author card Timothy Sykes picture

Matt Monaco

Mentor and Trainer at StocksToTrade.com, Lead Mentor at Small Cap Rockets and To The Moon Report
He is a diligent trader and teacher in his To The Moon Report blogs and Small Cap Rockets strategy webinars. He shows up every day, and expects his students to as well. Matt is fond of trading sketchy, volatile OTC stocks with profit potential. His favorite patterns are panic dip buys and breakouts.
Read More

* Results are not typical and will vary from person to person. Making money trading stocks takes time, dedication, and hard work. There are inherent risks involved with investing in the stock market, including the loss of your investment. Past performance in the market is not indicative of future results. Any investment is at your own risk. See Terms of Service here

The available research on day trading suggests that most active traders lose money. Fees and overtrading are major contributors to these losses.

A 2000 study called “Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors” evaluated 66,465 U.S. households that held stocks from 1991 to 1996. The households that traded most averaged an 11.4% annual return during a period where the overall market gained 17.9%. These lower returns were attributed to overconfidence.

A 2014 paper (revised 2019) titled “Learning Fast or Slow?” analyzed the complete transaction history of the Taiwan Stock Exchange between 1992 and 2006. It looked at the ongoing performance of day traders in this sample, and found that 97% of day traders can expect to lose money from trading, and more than 90% of all day trading volume can be traced to investors who predictably lose money. Additionally, it tied the behavior of gamblers and drivers who get more speeding tickets to overtrading, and cited studies showing that legalized gambling has an inverse effect on trading volume.

A 2019 research study (revised 2020) called “Day Trading for a Living?” observed 19,646 Brazilian futures contract traders who started day trading from 2013 to 2015, and recorded two years of their trading activity. The study authors found that 97% of traders with more than 300 days actively trading lost money, and only 1.1% earned more than the Brazilian minimum wage ($16 USD per day). They hypothesized that the greater returns shown in previous studies did not differentiate between frequent day traders and those who traded rarely, and that more frequent trading activity decreases the chance of profitability.

These studies show the wide variance of the available data on day trading profitability. One thing that seems clear from the research is that most day traders lose money .

Millionaire Media 66 W Flagler St. Ste. 900 Miami, FL 33130 United States (888) 878-3621 This is for information purposes only as Millionaire Media LLC nor Timothy Sykes is registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser. No information herein is intended as securities brokerage, investment, tax, accounting or legal advice, as an offer or solicitation of an offer to sell or buy, or as an endorsement, recommendation or sponsorship of any company, security or fund. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes cannot and does not assess, verify or guarantee the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information, the suitability or profitability of any particular investment, or the potential value of any investment or informational source. The reader bears responsibility for his/her own investment research and decisions, should seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before making any investment, and investigate and fully understand any and all risks before investing. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes in no way warrants the solvency, financial condition, or investment advisability of any of the securities mentioned in communications or websites. In addition, Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this information. This information is not intended to be used as the sole basis of any investment decision, nor should it be construed as advice designed to meet the investment needs of any particular investor. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future returns.

Citations for Disclaimer

Barber, Brad M. and Odean, Terrance, Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors. Available at SSRN: “Day Trading for a Living?”

Barber, Brad M. and Lee, Yi-Tsung and Liu, Yu-Jane and Odean, Terrance and Zhang, Ke, Learning Fast or Slow? (May 28, 2019). Forthcoming: Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=2535636”

Chague, Fernando and De-Losso, Rodrigo and Giovannetti, Bruno, Day Trading for a Living? (June 11, 2020). Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=3423101”