timothy sykes logo
CRML Stock Draws Buy Rating As Tanbreez Momentum Builds Thumbnail

CRML Stock Draws Buy Rating As Tanbreez Momentum Builds

ELLIS HOBBSUPDATED JUL. 22, 2026, 11:32 AM ET
Reviewed by Jack Kelloggand Fact-checked by Tim Sykes

Critical Metals Corp. stocks have been trading up by 8.47 percent after securing a transformative long-term strategic supply agreement.

Key Takeaways

  • Cantor Fitzgerald started coverage with a Speculative Buy on CRML and a $18 price target, pointing to Tanbreez’s heavy rare earth strength, expansion potential, rapid progress, and downstream exposure.
  • A 15‑year offtake deal with REalloys ties Tanbreez production into a non‑Chinese heavy rare earth supply chain aimed at U.S. defense demand, giving Critical Metals Corp rare visibility.
  • Ownership in the Tanbreez project is now 92.5%, with a 10,000 m drill program underway and Clear Street hired to explore value‑maximizing options after CRML surged 757% over the past year.
  • A 10,000‑meter diamond drilling campaign at Tanbreez is focused on expanding resources, refining geology, planning a mine, and preparing for future development work.
  • The amended European Lithium acquisition keeps commercial terms intact and targets a around 2026/09 close, with European Lithium holders expected to own about 41% of the combined CRML‑led company.

Candlestick Chart

Live Update At 11:32:25 EDT: On Wednesday, July 22, 2026 Critical Metals Corp. stock [NASDAQ: CRML] is trending up by 8.47%! Discover the key drivers behind this movement as well as our expert analysis in the detailed breakdown below.

Quick Financial Overview

CRML is trading like a classic story stock. The fundamentals say “early‑stage,” while the chart screams “high‑beta momentum.” Over the past few weeks, Critical Metals Corp has slipped from the $10 area down toward the mid‑$6 range, even after a 757% run over the last year tied to its Tanbreez project in Greenland.

The recent daily data show a steady fade: CRML closed near $10.27 in late 2026/06 and has since trended lower, printing a recent close around $6.89. That is a steep drawdown, but the intraday tape shows support: today’s trading has been a slow grind higher from the low $6.30s out of the open, holding higher lows and tightening ranges. That usually signals dip buyers stepping in, not a total exit.

On the balance sheet, Critical Metals Corp is clearly pre‑revenue in practical terms, with roughly $0.56M in trailing revenue against an enterprise value near $940.47M. A price‑to‑sales ratio above 1,300 and price‑to‑book around 3.7 tell traders this is all about future value at Tanbreez and the planned lithium footprint. Leverage is moderate, with long‑term debt about $15M and total equity near $91.92M, so CRML has room to finance growth but no cushion if sentiment breaks. For active traders, this is a volatility vehicle, not a value name.

Why Traders Are Watching CRML’s Tanbreez Story

CRML has become a magnet for momentum traders because the story hits several powerful themes at once: rare earths, U.S. defense supply chains, and tight non‑Chinese sourcing. Critical Metals Corp controls most of the Tanbreez heavy rare earth deposit in Southern Greenland and has locked down a 15‑year offtake agreement with REalloys for part of Phase 1 production. That deal effectively ties CRML into a non‑Chinese heavy REE pipeline aimed at U.S. defense demand, which is one of the hottest macro narratives in materials right now.

At the same time, Critical Metals Corp has ramped up activity on the ground. A 10,000‑meter diamond drilling campaign is underway at Tanbreez, targeting resource expansion, better geological models, and early mine planning. CRML has also increased its stake in the project to 92.5%, tightening its grip on any future upside. These are classic catalysts that keep traders watching for drill updates, resource estimates, and engineering milestones.

Wall Street is starting to validate the story. Cantor Fitzgerald just initiated coverage on Critical Metals Corp with a Speculative Buy rating and a $18 price target, leaning on Tanbreez’s strong heavy rare earth profile, expansion potential, and existing offtake and JV deals that could feed higher‑margin downstream processing. For traders, that $18 number becomes a psychological anchor above the current $6–$7 handle.

In parallel, CRML has engaged Clear Street and White & Case to run a strategic review, aiming to monetize non‑core assets and refocus capital on Tanbreez. That process opens the door to spin‑offs, asset sales, JVs, or partnerships. Each of those paths carries headline risk, but they also create potential trading catalysts as the market re‑prices Critical Metals Corp’s portfolio around its flagship asset.

Conclusion

Putting it all together, CRML sits at the intersection of hype and execution. The Tanbreez project has already powered a 757% share‑price surge over the past year, and Critical Metals Corp now owns 92.5% of that asset, is drilling aggressively, and has a 15‑year offtake with REalloys that plugs it into a defense‑driven, non‑Chinese heavy rare earths chain. That explains why a major broker like Cantor Fitzgerald was comfortable stepping in with a Speculative Buy and a $18 target even as the stock corrects.

At the same time, there is real complexity under the hood. The planned acquisition of European Lithium, now moving ahead with amended mechanics but unchanged terms, will hand European Lithium holders about 41% of the combined company when it closes around 2026/09. For CRML traders, that means substantial dilution but also broader exposure to lithium alongside Tanbreez. The ongoing strategic review led by Clear Street reinforces that Critical Metals Corp is still shaping its portfolio, and that process can whip the stock around.

For active traders in the Tim Sykes community, the setup in CRML is clear: huge story, big moves, and no guarantee the fundamentals will ever catch up to the valuation. As Tim Sykes likes to say, “I don’t fall in love with stories, I react to price action and cut losses quickly.” As millionaire penny stock trader and teacher Tim Sykes, says, “Preparation plus patience leads to big profits.”. CRML fits that mindset perfectly. Treat Critical Metals Corp as a high‑volatility, catalyst‑driven trading vehicle, study the chart around news flow, and remember this article is for educational and research purposes only, not a recommendation to trade.

This is stock news, not investment advice. Timothy Sykes News delivers real-time stock market news focused on key catalysts driving short-term price movements. Our content is tailored for active traders and investors seeking to capitalize on rapid price fluctuations, particularly in volatile sectors like penny stocks. Readers come to us for detailed coverage on earnings reports, mergers, FDA approvals, new contracts, and unusual trading volumes that can trigger significant short-term price action. Some users utilize our news to explain sudden stock movements, while others rely on it for diligent research into potential investment opportunities.

Dive deeper into the world of trading with Timothy Sykes, renowned for his expertise in penny stocks. Explore his top picks and discover the strategies that have propelled him to success with these articles:

Once you’ve got some stocks on watch, elevate your trading game with StocksToTrade the ultimate platform for traders. With specialized tools for swing and day trading, StocksToTrade will guide you through the market’s twists and turns.
Dig into StocksToTrade’s watchlists here:


How much has this post helped you?



Leave a reply

* Results are not typical and will vary from person to person. Making money trading stocks takes time, dedication, and hard work. There are inherent risks involved with investing in the stock market, including the loss of your investment. Past performance in the market is not indicative of future results. Any investment is at your own risk. See Terms of Service here

The available research on day trading suggests that most active traders lose money. Fees and overtrading are major contributors to these losses.

A 2000 study called “Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors” evaluated 66,465 U.S. households that held stocks from 1991 to 1996. The households that traded most averaged an 11.4% annual return during a period where the overall market gained 17.9%. These lower returns were attributed to overconfidence.

A 2014 paper (revised 2019) titled “Learning Fast or Slow?” analyzed the complete transaction history of the Taiwan Stock Exchange between 1992 and 2006. It looked at the ongoing performance of day traders in this sample, and found that 97% of day traders can expect to lose money from trading, and more than 90% of all day trading volume can be traced to investors who predictably lose money. Additionally, it tied the behavior of gamblers and drivers who get more speeding tickets to overtrading, and cited studies showing that legalized gambling has an inverse effect on trading volume.

A 2019 research study (revised 2020) called “Day Trading for a Living?” observed 19,646 Brazilian futures contract traders who started day trading from 2013 to 2015, and recorded two years of their trading activity. The study authors found that 97% of traders with more than 300 days actively trading lost money, and only 1.1% earned more than the Brazilian minimum wage ($16 USD per day). They hypothesized that the greater returns shown in previous studies did not differentiate between frequent day traders and those who traded rarely, and that more frequent trading activity decreases the chance of profitability.

These studies show the wide variance of the available data on day trading profitability. One thing that seems clear from the research is that most day traders lose money .

Millionaire Media 66 W Flagler St. Ste. 900 Miami, FL 33130 United States (888) 878-3621 This is for information purposes only as Millionaire Media LLC nor Timothy Sykes is registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser. No information herein is intended as securities brokerage, investment, tax, accounting or legal advice, as an offer or solicitation of an offer to sell or buy, or as an endorsement, recommendation or sponsorship of any company, security or fund. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes cannot and does not assess, verify or guarantee the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information, the suitability or profitability of any particular investment, or the potential value of any investment or informational source. The reader bears responsibility for his/her own investment research and decisions, should seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before making any investment, and investigate and fully understand any and all risks before investing. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes in no way warrants the solvency, financial condition, or investment advisability of any of the securities mentioned in communications or websites. In addition, Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this information. This information is not intended to be used as the sole basis of any investment decision, nor should it be construed as advice designed to meet the investment needs of any particular investor. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future returns.

Citations for Disclaimer

Barber, Brad M. and Odean, Terrance, Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors. Available at SSRN: “Day Trading for a Living?”

Barber, Brad M. and Lee, Yi-Tsung and Liu, Yu-Jane and Odean, Terrance and Zhang, Ke, Learning Fast or Slow? (May 28, 2019). Forthcoming: Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=2535636”

Chague, Fernando and De-Losso, Rodrigo and Giovannetti, Bruno, Day Trading for a Living? (June 11, 2020). Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=3423101”