timothy sykes logo
Calumet Inc Jumps As Wall Street Lifts Price Targets Thumbnail

Calumet Inc Jumps As Wall Street Lifts Price Targets

ELLIS HOBBSUPDATED AUG. 30, 2026, 11:04 AM ET
Reviewed by Jack Kelloggand Fact-checked by Tim Sykes

Calumet Inc stocks have been trading up by 4.33 percent after upbeat earnings and strong guidance boosted investor confidence.

What Traders Need To Know

  • Q2 EPS improved to -$1.09 from -$1.70 while revenue climbed to $1.45B from $1.03B, helped by strong specialty products margins and Montana Renewables MaxSAF 150 expansion progress.
  • Quarterly revenue of $1.45B beat the $1.12B consensus, signaling stronger-than-expected demand and pricing power.
  • Management cut debt by $115M in July, supporting a deleveraging story alongside growth spending.
  • Bank of America lifted its CLMT price target from $38 to $45 and kept a Buy rating, citing faster balance-sheet repair from higher free cash flow.
  • UBS, Goldman Sachs, and TD Cowen also raised targets to $47, $45, and $40, but stayed Neutral/Hold, reflecting upside with ongoing risk concerns.

Candlestick Chart

Weekly Update Aug 24 – Aug 28, 2026: On Sunday, August 30, 2026 Calumet Inc stock [NASDAQ: CLMT] is trending up by 4.33%! Discover the key drivers behind this movement as well as our expert analysis in the detailed breakdown below.

Materials industry expert:

Analyst sentiment – positive

Calumet (CLMT) remains a high-operating-leverage, transition story with improving but still fragile fundamentals. EBITDA margin at 5.7% on $4.1B LTM revenue is modest, while EBIT and net margins remain negative, reflected in ROA of roughly -5% and deeply negative equity (BVPS -$12.94). Cash generation is better than earnings: Q2 operating cash flow of $92M and FCF of $54M against net loss of $96M signal meaningful non-cash and working-capital effects. Leverage is heavy (LT debt ~$2.2B, current ratio 0.8, interest coverage 1.3x), but recent debt paydown and positive FCF demonstrate credible, though still early, deleveraging momentum.

Technically, CLMT is consolidating at the high end of its recent range after a sharp re-rating. The weekly data show price pinned between roughly $45.75 and $47.80, with repeated closes in the mid‑$47s and shallow intraday dips quickly bought, indicating firm demand and tight supply near new highs. Recent 5‑minute candles show orderly intraday pullbacks on lighter volume and pushes higher on stronger volume, confirming a constructive, near-term uptrend. Actionable level: $45.50–46.00 is the key support zone; a pullback into that band is a buy zone with a tight stop below $45.

Fundamentally, CLMT now trades as a deleveraging-plus-renewables re‑rating story versus Materials and Chemicals peers. Street targets have reset sharply higher (UBS/GS/BoA/TD Cowen all at $40–47) on evidence of improving specialty margins, Q2 revenue beat, and clear debt reduction plus Montana Renewables MaxSAF growth. Still, negative GAAP earnings, subscale balance sheet, and execution risk on SAF ramp keep it riskier than integrated chemicals peers. Base case: maintain a constructive stance with a 6–12 month upside target of $52 and strong support at $45, resistance near $50.

Quick Financial Overview

Calumet Inc and CLMT are trading in a firm uptrend, with recent weekly closes clustering around the mid-$40s. The stock printed a tight series between about $45.77 and $47.79 across recent days, with the latest close near $47.75. Intraday, a 5‑minute candle showed a strong range from roughly $46.26 to $48.38 before settling back at $47.75, pointing to active two-way trading but clear demand on dips.

On the income side, CLMT is still loss-making, but the trend is improving. Q2 revenue hit $1.45B, well ahead of the roughly $1.12B consensus, with EPS narrowing to -$1.09 from -$1.70 year over year. Gross margin sits around 6.6%, and EBITDA margin is about 5.7%, so this is a thin-margin, high-throughput business, but the direction of change is positive.

Balance-sheet risk remains the key overhang. Total revenue over the last year is about $4.14B, with a price-to-sales ratio near 0.91, suggesting the market is not paying a premium despite the recent run. Long-term debt is roughly $2.23B, equity is negative, and working capital is around -$194M, so leverage is heavy. That said, CLMT generated about $92.3M in operating cash flow and $54M in free cash flow in the latest quarter, and management has already reduced debt by $115M, which supports the analyst narrative around accelerated deleveraging.

Conclusion

Calumet Inc is in the middle of a re-rating driven by better numbers, but the story is still high risk. Q2 revenue of $1.45B beat expectations and CLMT narrowed its loss, while free cash flow turned solid enough for management to pay down $115M of debt and still fund growth at Montana Renewables. Price action near $47–$48 shows that buyers are willing to support the stock on dips, but the intraday swings highlight that this is not a quiet name.

On the other side of the ledger, CLMT still carries more than $2B of long-term debt, negative equity, and thin margins, which is why Goldman Sachs, UBS, and TD Cowen all raised price targets but stayed Neutral/Hold. Their targets up to $40–$47, plus Bank of America’s Buy at $45, tell traders that upside exists, but execution on sustainable aviation fuel ramp and continued debt reduction will decide how far the re-rating can go. The upcoming Barclays energy-power conference on 2026/09/10 gives management another chance to tighten the story around specialty products and renewables.

For traders, this is a momentum and catalyst play anchored in improving fundamentals but wrapped in balance-sheet risk. Levels around the mid-$40s now act as a key reference area: sustained closes above there keep the bullish narrative intact, while a breakdown would flag that the rerating may be stalling. In a name like CLMT, where volatility can trigger emotional entries and exits, discipline is crucial. As millionaire penny stock trader and teacher Tim Sykes says, “There is always another play around the corner; don’t chase just because you feel FOMO.” As I tell my students, “You do not get paid for being early or late, you get paid for trading the inflection — and in CLMT, that inflection is where rising cash flow meets heavy debt.””,”scores”:{“risk-level”:”high”},”trade”:”true

This is stock news, not investment advice. Timothy Sykes News delivers real-time stock market news focused on key catalysts driving short-term price movements. Our content is tailored for active traders and investors seeking to capitalize on rapid price fluctuations, particularly in volatile sectors like penny stocks. Readers come to us for detailed coverage on earnings reports, mergers, FDA approvals, new contracts, and unusual trading volumes that can trigger significant short-term price action. Some users utilize our news to explain sudden stock movements, while others rely on it for diligent research into potential investment opportunities.

Dive deeper into the world of trading with Timothy Sykes, renowned for his expertise in penny stocks. Explore his top picks and discover the strategies that have propelled him to success with these articles:

Once you’ve got some stocks on watch, elevate your trading game with StocksToTrade the ultimate platform for traders. With specialized tools for swing and day trading, StocksToTrade will guide you through the market’s twists and turns.
Dig into StocksToTrade’s watchlists here:


How much has this post helped you?



Leave a reply

* Results are not typical and will vary from person to person. Making money trading stocks takes time, dedication, and hard work. There are inherent risks involved with investing in the stock market, including the loss of your investment. Past performance in the market is not indicative of future results. Any investment is at your own risk. See Terms of Service here

The available research on day trading suggests that most active traders lose money. Fees and overtrading are major contributors to these losses.

A 2000 study called “Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors” evaluated 66,465 U.S. households that held stocks from 1991 to 1996. The households that traded most averaged an 11.4% annual return during a period where the overall market gained 17.9%. These lower returns were attributed to overconfidence.

A 2014 paper (revised 2019) titled “Learning Fast or Slow?” analyzed the complete transaction history of the Taiwan Stock Exchange between 1992 and 2006. It looked at the ongoing performance of day traders in this sample, and found that 97% of day traders can expect to lose money from trading, and more than 90% of all day trading volume can be traced to investors who predictably lose money. Additionally, it tied the behavior of gamblers and drivers who get more speeding tickets to overtrading, and cited studies showing that legalized gambling has an inverse effect on trading volume.

A 2019 research study (revised 2020) called “Day Trading for a Living?” observed 19,646 Brazilian futures contract traders who started day trading from 2013 to 2015, and recorded two years of their trading activity. The study authors found that 97% of traders with more than 300 days actively trading lost money, and only 1.1% earned more than the Brazilian minimum wage ($16 USD per day). They hypothesized that the greater returns shown in previous studies did not differentiate between frequent day traders and those who traded rarely, and that more frequent trading activity decreases the chance of profitability.

These studies show the wide variance of the available data on day trading profitability. One thing that seems clear from the research is that most day traders lose money .

Millionaire Media 66 W Flagler St. Ste. 900 Miami, FL 33130 United States (888) 878-3621 This is for information purposes only as Millionaire Media LLC nor Timothy Sykes is registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser. No information herein is intended as securities brokerage, investment, tax, accounting or legal advice, as an offer or solicitation of an offer to sell or buy, or as an endorsement, recommendation or sponsorship of any company, security or fund. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes cannot and does not assess, verify or guarantee the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information, the suitability or profitability of any particular investment, or the potential value of any investment or informational source. The reader bears responsibility for his/her own investment research and decisions, should seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before making any investment, and investigate and fully understand any and all risks before investing. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes in no way warrants the solvency, financial condition, or investment advisability of any of the securities mentioned in communications or websites. In addition, Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this information. This information is not intended to be used as the sole basis of any investment decision, nor should it be construed as advice designed to meet the investment needs of any particular investor. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future returns.

Citations for Disclaimer

Barber, Brad M. and Odean, Terrance, Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors. Available at SSRN: “Day Trading for a Living?”

Barber, Brad M. and Lee, Yi-Tsung and Liu, Yu-Jane and Odean, Terrance and Zhang, Ke, Learning Fast or Slow? (May 28, 2019). Forthcoming: Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=2535636”

Chague, Fernando and De-Losso, Rodrigo and Giovannetti, Bruno, Day Trading for a Living? (June 11, 2020). Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=3423101”