timothy sykes logo

Trading Lessons

Stock Market Under Biden vs. Trump: A Comparative Analysis

Timothy SykesAvatar
Written by Timothy Sykes
Updated 4/25/2025 19 min read

Comparing the stock market under Joe Biden and Donald Trump shows how leadership in the White House can influence traders’ decision-making through policy shifts, economic pressure points, and market sentiment. Both presidencies saw record highs in major indices like the S&P 500, but the forces behind those moves reflect different strategies on taxes, inflation control, and government spending. Understanding how these shifts affect volatility and trader confidence is key to building a reliable trading strategy in any market.

You should read this article because it compares how the stock market performed under Biden vs. Trump using key data and policy analysis.

I’ll answer the following questions:

  • How did the S&P 500 perform under Biden compared to Trump?
  • Which sectors thrived under Biden and which under Trump?
  • How did each president’s tax policies affect the stock market?
  • What role did the Federal Reserve play during both presidencies?
    Was market volatility higher during the Biden or Trump administration?
  • How did corporate earnings shift under each president?
  • Did inflation impact stock performance more under Biden or Trump?
  • How did trader sentiment and confidence vary between the two administrations?

Let’s get to the content!

Stock Market Performance: Trump vs. Biden

The stock market’s performance under the Trump and Biden administrations tells two very different stories tied to the timing of elections, economic conditions, and policy direction. Donald Trump entered office with a pro-business agenda focused on tax cuts and deregulation, which fueled investor enthusiasm and strong momentum in the S&P 500, Dow Jones, and Nasdaq. In contrast, Joe Biden took office during a pandemic recovery phase, with markets already climbing due to fiscal and monetary policy support initiated under Barack Obama and continued through Trump’s final year.

Under Trump, market optimism surged following the 2016 election, leading to fast gains driven by promises of corporate tax reform and trade renegotiations. Biden’s inauguration came with inflation fears and expectations of higher taxes, but his administration’s massive government spending packages and continued support from the Federal Reserve helped keep stock prices rising in the short term. As someone who’s traded through both administrations, I’ve seen firsthand how political headlines can create fast-moving setups — but the real edge comes from watching how traders react, not just what policies say on paper.

To understand the actual market conditions underneath political headlines, it’s important to use a trading platform with real-time data.

When it comes to trading platforms, StocksToTrade is first on my list. It’s a powerful day and swing trading platform that integrates with most major brokers. I helped to design it, which means it has all the trading indicators, news sources, and stock screening capabilities that traders like me look for in a platform.

Grab your 14-day StocksToTrade trial today — it’s only $7!

S&P 500 Growth

Post image

Get my weekly watchlist, free

Sign up to jump start your trading education!

The S&P 500 saw substantial growth under both presidents, but for different reasons and with different pacing. During Trump’s administration, the S&P 500 gained approximately 70% from January 2017 to January 2021. That run included strong years in 2017 and 2019, aided by corporate tax cuts and low interest rates, though it was interrupted by the COVID-19 crash in early 2020.

Under Biden, the S&P 500 continued to rise post-pandemic, hitting record highs in 2021 before volatility returned with rising inflation and rate hikes. While returns slowed in 2022, a tech-driven rebound in 2023—fueled by stocks like Nvidia—kept the benchmark index in play for traders. I teach my students not to follow politics, but to track how policy shifts affect sector rotation and earnings sentiment that move stocks like Tesla and others in the S&P 500.

Dow Jones Growth

The Dow Jones Industrial Average responded strongly to Trump’s business-friendly approach, especially his focus on American manufacturing, corporate tax cuts, and reduced regulations. From his election through the end of his term, the Dow rose nearly 56%, peaking in early 2020 before the COVID-19 pandemic led to sharp losses.

Under Biden, the Dow also gained, but more modestly compared to tech-heavy indices. Infrastructure spending and support for traditional companies helped some of the industrial names, but inflation concerns and rising interest rates muted gains. In my experience, the Dow tells more about legacy sectors — banks, industrials, energy — where timing is slower but setups are often cleaner when you match technicals with earnings surprises or macro events.

More Breaking News

Nasdaq Growth

The Nasdaq thrived under both presidents, but tech’s explosive momentum played out differently. Trump’s first three years were a tech boom driven by low taxes, deregulation, and strong corporate earnings. Tech stocks like Apple, Microsoft, and Amazon led a run that saw the Nasdaq surge more than 140% before COVID-19 triggered a sell-off.

Biden’s term began with an acceleration in that same tech strength, driven by massive liquidity, low interest rates, and rising demand for AI and semiconductors. Names like Nvidia exploded as traders piled into growth stories, but that also meant sharper volatility when the Fed shifted monetary policy. I’ve always taught that chasing momentum is dangerous without discipline — and the Nasdaq, more than any other index, proves how fast greed and fear can shift stock prices.

Major Policies

Donald Trump’s administration centered on tax cuts, deregulation, and tariffs, particularly targeting China, with the aim of reshaping global trade. These Republican policies spurred business confidence and boosted stock returns in some sectors, especially finance and industrials. However, the tariff battles also added uncertainty, causing short-term volatility in companies exposed to global supply chains.

Joe Biden focused on stimulus packages, infrastructure investments, and clean energy initiatives, with plans to increase taxes on corporations and high earners. These Democratic policies supported spending-driven GDP growth but added inflation pressure, influencing Federal Reserve actions and market direction. Over two decades of trading, I’ve seen how every administration picks winners and losers — your job as a trader is to spot those changes early, whether it’s energy under Trump or EVs under Biden.

Market Volatility

Market volatility spiked during both presidencies but for different reasons. Under Trump, volatility often followed sudden tweets or geopolitical shocks, especially around trade wars with China and North Korea. The biggest spike came with the COVID-19 crash in March 2020, where markets plunged before a Federal Reserve rescue led to one of the fastest rebounds in history.

Under Biden, volatility centered on inflation and interest rate hikes. As the Federal Reserve shifted from easy money to tightening, stocks experienced rapid swings, especially in 2022. In fast-moving markets, emotional traders get crushed. That’s why I focus on patterns and preparation — because policy and headlines may change, but disciplined trading habits always matter more than any president’s press conference.

Even with different triggers, both presidencies reminded traders how fast volatility can hit. I’ve seen students get shaken out of trades not because the setup was wrong, but because they weren’t prepared for the pace of price action. Under Trump, that meant reacting to sudden tweets. Under Biden, it meant adjusting fast to Fed rate hikes. Volatility doesn’t care who’s in office — it rewards traders who stay alert and flexible. If you’re wondering how Trump’s tweets really impacted the markets, check out this breakdown: Is Trump Bad for the Stock Market?

Stock Market Gains and Growth Comparison Under Biden vs Trump Administration

The total stock market gains under each presidency reflect both macroeconomic conditions and investor sentiment tied to government leadership. Trump’s term saw strong GDP growth, low unemployment, and historic tax cuts that boosted corporate earnings and equity prices. Biden’s administration managed a post-pandemic rebound with government spending and extended monetary support, but inflation concerns and Fed tightening created headwinds for consistent returns.

In terms of raw numbers, the Trump administration saw stronger early growth, while Biden’s term had more uneven but still positive performance, driven by tech-heavy gains in the Nasdaq. I’ve taught thousands of students that markets react not just to policy but to how policies affect real-world data like earnings, employment, and interest rates. Staying focused on price action and market psychology is how you survive the swings, no matter who’s in the Oval Office.

It’s also worth looking at how the Obama-to-Trump transition influenced market momentum. When Trump took over, markets were already climbing after years of steady gains under Obama. That handoff mattered — early gains under Trump weren’t starting from zero, and that context changes how we compare results. I always remind traders: each president inherits different conditions, so don’t compare numbers without the full picture. If you’re interested in how that transition shaped the early Trump rally, this breakdown lays it out clearly: Obama vs. Trump Stock Market Comparison

Annual Stock Market Growth Rates

Annual growth rates under Trump averaged around 12% across major indices, excluding the pandemic crash in 2020. His first year alone saw the S&P 500 rise over 19%, boosted by anticipation of corporate tax reform and regulatory rollbacks. Markets liked predictability, and the steady economic growth helped keep investor confidence high.

Biden’s average annual growth has been lower, around 7–8% depending on the index and year, with tech making up most of the positive gains. Inflation, rising interest rates, and banking instability (like the 2023 regional bank failures) added uncertainty. This uneven growth taught many of my students how critical risk management is — it’s not just about how much a market moves, but whether your account can survive the pullbacks between the rallies.

Impact of Economic Policies on Stock Returns

Trump’s economic policies—primarily tax cuts and deregulation—led to strong earnings and higher valuations, especially in large-cap companies. Lower corporate taxes meant more profit retention, which pushed up stock prices and encouraged stock buybacks. His focus on “America First” also reshaped global supply chains, which affected costs and margins across sectors.

Biden’s policies have emphasized spending, equity, and long-term structural change, with effects spread unevenly across the market. While stimulus measures increased consumer demand and helped companies like Tesla and Nvidia, higher wage pressures and taxes created concern in traditional business sectors. When I trade, I don’t just react to policies—I track how companies adjust their guidance and how stocks react to earnings versus expectations. That reaction is the signal.

Sectors That Thrived Under Each Presidency

Under Trump, the financial, energy, and industrial sectors saw strong gains, fueled by deregulation and corporate tax reform. Banks performed well with rising interest rates and fewer restrictions, while energy companies benefitted from expanded drilling and relaxed environmental oversight.

Under Biden, tech, green energy, and healthcare stocks gained ground, especially with the passage of clean energy subsidies and government contracts. Sectors tied to long-term innovation and infrastructure spending found support even during inflationary periods. I’ve always trained traders to track hot sectors, because that’s where the volume flows. Whether it’s oil stocks under Trump or solar plays under Biden, the market will always reward attention and adaptability.

Key Factors Driving Market Trends

Market trends are shaped by more than presidential speeches. Tax policies, monetary policy from the Federal Reserve, earnings cycles, and trade relations all carry weight. As traders, it’s not about predicting which president is better — it’s about reacting to what’s actually moving the market and understanding why it’s happening.

Every time the government adjusts rates, changes tariffs, or rolls out new fiscal policies, it creates ripple effects across stocks and ETFs. I teach traders to watch those catalysts and react with logic, not emotion. The best setups often come when fear or greed takes over after a major announcement.

Tax Policies

Trump’s 2017 tax reform cut the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, increasing after-tax earnings and driving stock prices higher. This was a clear signal for traders: more profit equals more upside potential. It also led to record buybacks and boosted valuations across several sectors, especially finance and tech.

Biden proposed increasing corporate taxes and taxing capital gains at higher rates for wealthy individuals, though many of those proposals have stalled. While the market reacted negatively to these announcements initially, the actual impact was muted since policy changes didn’t pass quickly. In trading, you learn that proposed tax hikes often spook markets—but actual implementation takes time. Trade the reaction, not the rumor.

Corporate Earnings

Corporate earnings boomed under both administrations, but the drivers were different. Under Trump, lower taxes and reduced regulation gave businesses room to grow profits quickly, especially in traditional sectors. High earnings beats created momentum plays that fueled multi-day runners — great opportunities for reactive traders.

Under Biden, earnings rebounded post-pandemic but were often hit by rising costs from inflation, wages, and interest rates. Tech companies continued to dominate earnings headlines, while consumer-facing businesses struggled with squeezed margins. My best trades often come from earnings surprises — not just good results, but unexpected reactions. And that happens under every administration, if you know where to look.

Federal Reserve Policies

The Federal Reserve played a central role in both presidencies. Under Trump, the Fed lowered interest rates multiple times, supporting asset prices and creating one of the longest bull runs in history. Trump often criticized the Fed, pushing for even lower rates to stimulate growth.

Biden inherited near-zero rates and massive quantitative easing, but inflation forced the Fed to hike aggressively in 2022 and 2023. Those hikes triggered sharp corrections, especially in high-growth stocks. I teach traders to respect the Fed — they control the cost of money, and when money gets expensive, stocks get volatile. It’s not about guessing the next move. It’s about reacting fast and managing your risk.

Trade Policies

Trump’s administration was defined by aggressive trade policies, especially tariffs on Chinese goods. This caused market shocks and sector rotations as companies scrambled to adjust supply chains. For traders, those tariff announcements created volatility spikes that rewarded speed and precision.

Biden has kept many of those tariffs in place but shifted toward multilateral alliances and domestic production incentives. Stocks tied to semiconductors and critical infrastructure have benefited. Whether it’s trade wars or reshoring trends, traders need to stay alert to headlines that shift sector sentiment. That’s where short-term opportunities are born.

Global Market Influence

The global market played a bigger role during Biden’s presidency, as supply chain disruptions, war in Ukraine, and international inflation trends hit markets hard. The Fed’s actions rippled through global economies, affecting credit markets, the dollar, and emerging market stocks.

Trump focused more on bilateral relations and trade renegotiation, which insulated some sectors but created friction with allies and trading partners. Traders had to watch both the White House and global headlines to understand where money would move. The bigger your awareness, the more prepared you are for fast-moving breakouts and breakdowns.

Was the Stock Market Better Under Biden or Trump?

The stock market performed well under both Biden and Trump, but for different reasons. Trump’s term saw faster, more consistent growth in major indices driven by tax reform and business confidence. Biden’s term featured sharp rebounds and strong tech-led rallies, but also more frequent volatility due to inflation and rising interest rates.

For traders, the better presidency depends on your style. Momentum traders might prefer Trump’s smooth uptrend, while short-sellers and scalpers might thrive on Biden-era volatility. I’ve taught thousands of students through both cycles — what matters most isn’t who’s president, but how you prepare, react, and manage your trades when volatility hits.

Key Takeaways

The stock market under Trump showed stronger average growth tied to tax cuts and business-friendly policies, while Biden’s market has been more volatile but still profitable, especially in tech. Policies matter, but trader behavior drives short-term price action. Whether it’s the S&P 500, Nasdaq, or individual stocks, opportunities exist under any administration if you stay disciplined.

Government changes can affect sectors and sentiment, but good trading comes from pattern recognition, risk control, and a focus on process. As I’ve seen time and again in 20+ years of trading and teaching — traders who adapt win, no matter what party holds the Oval Office.

Trading isn’t rocket science. It’s a skill you build and work on like any other. Trading has changed my life, and I think this way of life should be open to more people…

I’ve built my Trading Challenge to pass on the things I had to learn for myself. It’s the kind of community that I wish I had when I was starting out.

We don’t accept everyone. If you’re up for the challenge — I want to hear from you.

Apply to the Trading Challenge here.

Trading is a battlefield. The more knowledge you have, the better prepared you’ll be.

Can you maintain good trading principles no matter who is in the Oval Office? Write “I’ll keep it simple Tim!” in the comments if you picked up on my trading philosophy!

Frequently Asked Questions

How did Kamala Harris influence market sentiment during Biden’s presidency?

Kamala Harris didn’t directly shape stock market policy, but her role as vice president helped reinforce Democratic priorities around infrastructure, clean energy, and economic equity. Her support of government spending initiatives tied to education and student loans influenced sectors like education services and renewable energy. While not a market mover herself, her presence reflected policy direction that traders watched closely for sector-specific plays.

How did voters and polls shape expectations for the stock market and economy?

Voters and pre-election polls heavily influenced market speculation, especially in the lead-up to each presidential election. During both Trump and Biden campaigns, traders positioned around expected outcomes in taxes, regulation, and the broader economy. Sentiment indicators tied to polls can drive short-term volatility, especially when markets anticipate large fiscal policy shifts after an election.

Did recession risk affect GDP and market direction during either presidency?

Yes, recession fears weighed heavily on markets during Biden’s term, especially as the Federal Reserve raised rates to control inflation, slowing GDP (Gross Domestic Product) growth. Under Trump, the COVID-19 shock in 2020 led to a sudden, sharp recession that reversed years of expansion. In both cases, recession risk shifted trader behavior toward safer setups and increased focus on timing entries around economic reports.

How do credit cards, loans, and mortgages impact investors and the market?

Rising interest rates under Biden increased the cost of credit cards, loans, and mortgages, tightening household budgets and slowing consumer demand. This shift affects investors’ outlooks on retail, housing, and banking sectors, where earnings are sensitive to borrowing costs. Traders who understand how debt impacts income and spending can better anticipate changes in company performance and stock value.

How did savings rates impact trading decisions and portfolio management?

Higher savings rates during early 2021 under Biden, driven by stimulus checks and limited spending options, gave many retail traders more capital to trade. As inflation rose and the cost of living increased, savings declined, which affected trading volume and risk tolerance. Managing a portfolio in that environment meant staying selective and protecting gains rather than overextending into low-quality plays.



How much has this post helped you?



Leave a reply

* Results are not typical and will vary from person to person. Making money trading stocks takes time, dedication, and hard work. There are inherent risks involved with investing in the stock market, including the loss of your investment. Past performance in the market is not indicative of future results. Any investment is at your own risk. See Terms of Service here

The available research on day trading suggests that most active traders lose money. Fees and overtrading are major contributors to these losses.

A 2000 study called “Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors” evaluated 66,465 U.S. households that held stocks from 1991 to 1996. The households that traded most averaged an 11.4% annual return during a period where the overall market gained 17.9%. These lower returns were attributed to overconfidence.

A 2014 paper (revised 2019) titled “Learning Fast or Slow?” analyzed the complete transaction history of the Taiwan Stock Exchange between 1992 and 2006. It looked at the ongoing performance of day traders in this sample, and found that 97% of day traders can expect to lose money from trading, and more than 90% of all day trading volume can be traced to investors who predictably lose money. Additionally, it tied the behavior of gamblers and drivers who get more speeding tickets to overtrading, and cited studies showing that legalized gambling has an inverse effect on trading volume.

A 2019 research study (revised 2020) called “Day Trading for a Living?” observed 19,646 Brazilian futures contract traders who started day trading from 2013 to 2015, and recorded two years of their trading activity. The study authors found that 97% of traders with more than 300 days actively trading lost money, and only 1.1% earned more than the Brazilian minimum wage ($16 USD per day). They hypothesized that the greater returns shown in previous studies did not differentiate between frequent day traders and those who traded rarely, and that more frequent trading activity decreases the chance of profitability.

These studies show the wide variance of the available data on day trading profitability. One thing that seems clear from the research is that most day traders lose money .

Millionaire Media 66 W Flagler St. Ste. 900 Miami, FL 33130 United States (888) 878-3621 This is for information purposes only as Millionaire Media LLC nor Timothy Sykes is registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser. No information herein is intended as securities brokerage, investment, tax, accounting or legal advice, as an offer or solicitation of an offer to sell or buy, or as an endorsement, recommendation or sponsorship of any company, security or fund. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes cannot and does not assess, verify or guarantee the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information, the suitability or profitability of any particular investment, or the potential value of any investment or informational source. The reader bears responsibility for his/her own investment research and decisions, should seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before making any investment, and investigate and fully understand any and all risks before investing. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes in no way warrants the solvency, financial condition, or investment advisability of any of the securities mentioned in communications or websites. In addition, Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this information. This information is not intended to be used as the sole basis of any investment decision, nor should it be construed as advice designed to meet the investment needs of any particular investor. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future returns.

Citations for Disclaimer

Barber, Brad M. and Odean, Terrance, Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors. Available at SSRN: “Day Trading for a Living?”

Barber, Brad M. and Lee, Yi-Tsung and Liu, Yu-Jane and Odean, Terrance and Zhang, Ke, Learning Fast or Slow? (May 28, 2019). Forthcoming: Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=2535636”

Chague, Fernando and De-Losso, Rodrigo and Giovannetti, Bruno, Day Trading for a Living? (June 11, 2020). Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=3423101”