<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Better Chart Of This PERFECT Breakout [PICTURE]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timothysykes.com/2010/01/a-better-chart-of-this-perfect-breakout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timothysykes.com/2010/01/a-better-chart-of-this-perfect-breakout/</link>
	<description>How To Trade Penny Stocks Without The Stock Promoter BS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.timothysykes.com/2010/01/a-better-chart-of-this-perfect-breakout/comment-page-1/#comment-156009</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.test.timothysykes.com/?p=9398#comment-156009</guid>
		<description>call was plain bad, but i NEVEr stick around for the news...the runup before the news was predictable...also did u see they issued shares based on friday&#039;s close...i think i just piggybacked a company determined to squeeze their stock in order not to dilute themselves so bad LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>call was plain bad, but i NEVEr stick around for the news&#8230;the runup before the news was predictable&#8230;also did u see they issued shares based on friday&#8217;s close&#8230;i think i just piggybacked a company determined to squeeze their stock in order not to dilute themselves so bad LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.timothysykes.com/2010/01/a-better-chart-of-this-perfect-breakout/comment-page-1/#comment-156007</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.test.timothysykes.com/?p=9398#comment-156007</guid>
		<description>Nice conference call &quot;catalyst&quot;.  Like i said, LUNA is a POS. LOL!  Good thing you sold cause your analysis was wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice conference call &#8220;catalyst&#8221;.  Like i said, LUNA is a POS. LOL!  Good thing you sold cause your analysis was wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.timothysykes.com/2010/01/a-better-chart-of-this-perfect-breakout/comment-page-1/#comment-156000</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.test.timothysykes.com/?p=9398#comment-156000</guid>
		<description>see my pennystocking part deux dvd...the more timeframes its breaks the better, the more trders watching various time period get alets and become buyers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>see my pennystocking part deux dvd&#8230;the more timeframes its breaks the better, the more trders watching various time period get alets and become buyers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.timothysykes.com/2010/01/a-better-chart-of-this-perfect-breakout/comment-page-1/#comment-155999</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.test.timothysykes.com/?p=9398#comment-155999</guid>
		<description>VRMLQ was a good short when the momentum faded, but early short selling helped spike it more...some were shorting the first up day in LUNA now theyre getting squeezed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VRMLQ was a good short when the momentum faded, but early short selling helped spike it more&#8230;some were shorting the first up day in LUNA now theyre getting squeezed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.timothysykes.com/2010/01/a-better-chart-of-this-perfect-breakout/comment-page-1/#comment-155998</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.test.timothysykes.com/?p=9398#comment-155998</guid>
		<description>VRMLQ was a one in a thousand stock performance-wise.  Pretty slim chances that LUNA does the same in 2010 that VRMLQ did in 09.  Besides, there were some good opportunities to make $ shorting VRMLQ when it was short term overbought.  Same will be the case for LUNA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VRMLQ was a one in a thousand stock performance-wise.  Pretty slim chances that LUNA does the same in 2010 that VRMLQ did in 09.  Besides, there were some good opportunities to make $ shorting VRMLQ when it was short term overbought.  Same will be the case for LUNA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.timothysykes.com/2010/01/a-better-chart-of-this-perfect-breakout/comment-page-1/#comment-155997</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.test.timothysykes.com/?p=9398#comment-155997</guid>
		<description>alex, forget about making $, some of the biggest medical companies in the world dont make any $...its about technology/drug potential...LUNA was priced for dead, now this contract, mondays conference call, bankruptcy hearing and nasdaq hearing all this week, it might actually get a real valuation...remember VRMLQ was the top performer of 2009, emergining from bankruptcy with a big potential product...i&#039;ll be out of LUNA monday because its already exceeded my target, but thats just to lock it in, its not a potential short as the momentum is strong and afterhours buying was heavy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>alex, forget about making $, some of the biggest medical companies in the world dont make any $&#8230;its about technology/drug potential&#8230;LUNA was priced for dead, now this contract, mondays conference call, bankruptcy hearing and nasdaq hearing all this week, it might actually get a real valuation&#8230;remember VRMLQ was the top performer of 2009, emergining from bankruptcy with a big potential product&#8230;i&#8217;ll be out of LUNA monday because its already exceeded my target, but thats just to lock it in, its not a potential short as the momentum is strong and afterhours buying was heavy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.timothysykes.com/2010/01/a-better-chart-of-this-perfect-breakout/comment-page-1/#comment-155996</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.test.timothysykes.com/?p=9398#comment-155996</guid>
		<description>Nice trade but i think all the news is priced in for now.  We&#039;re still talking about a company that has never been able to turn a profit.  The contract will probably be no more lucrative than it was before, they&#039;re just lucky to get it renewed.   I wouldn&#039;t short it quite yet but with another big up day it would have good short potential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice trade but i think all the news is priced in for now.  We&#8217;re still talking about a company that has never been able to turn a profit.  The contract will probably be no more lucrative than it was before, they&#8217;re just lucky to get it renewed.   I wouldn&#8217;t short it quite yet but with another big up day it would have good short potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FeedTheBull</title>
		<link>http://www.timothysykes.com/2010/01/a-better-chart-of-this-perfect-breakout/comment-page-1/#comment-155995</link>
		<dc:creator>FeedTheBull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.test.timothysykes.com/?p=9398#comment-155995</guid>
		<description>Is there a time frame that you look at more than another while scanning for a breakout? Everyone always says, watch multiple timeframes, and in this case it was at their previous 52wk high, but what about the 2 year chart, when does that come into play (or does it)? Is a 6 month or a year a better indicator of short term breakouts or does it depend on where the price is compared to the last resistance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a time frame that you look at more than another while scanning for a breakout? Everyone always says, watch multiple timeframes, and in this case it was at their previous 52wk high, but what about the 2 year chart, when does that come into play (or does it)? Is a 6 month or a year a better indicator of short term breakouts or does it depend on where the price is compared to the last resistance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

