TwitterFacebookYouTube

Details On My New Aggressive Auto-Trading Covestor Account

Posted by Timothy Sykes on Wed 11th of Nov, 2009 03:00:31 PM

I’ve written HERE and HERE about my new Covestor auto-trading option which is perfect for people too busy/lazy to learn as a TIMalert subscribers or from my now 10 instructional DVD packages, but in addition to the my current auto-trading account, yeserday CV.IM and I launched a new, more aggressive auto-trading account.

You see the first one has a minimum of $10,000 (it was $30,000, but we lowered it since I’m not day trading, thus not subject to the stupid $25,000 required minimum Pattern Day Trader Rule), caries an annual management fee and is up 7 months in a row, yielding a total gain of just under 26%

According to annoying lawyers, past performance is not indicative of future reutnrs, but it’s fair to say, that account has been growing steadily enough to make the 1.5% annual management fee pretty negligible.

But…..

I trade that account very conservatively. As that account is now up to $175,000, even when I went bigtime short based on the misleading earnings press release from eOn Communications Corp. (EONC), raking in $9,000+ profit, it’s tough to make more than 2-5% per month gains. And I doubt that EONC trade even counted as Covestor requires a $50 million marketcap minimum, which unfortunately this pathetic little company does not have)

So to capture the maximum potential gains from ideal pump & dumps, this new aggressive auto-trading account, affectionately called “Tim Sykes Agg” (Agg stands for Aggressive you penny stock retards), won’t just invest the standard 10-30% of assets per play, this one is gonna be more like 60-100% of assets.

It goes against everything my instructional trading DVDs teach, but given the fact that my TIM trading account is up only 651% over 2 years while Covestor, which ignores cash value meaning it thinks I am going all in every time, says that account would be up 126,016% if I went all in every time

Worth a shot, right?

After all, past performance disclaimer aside, I have been right approximately 80-90% of the time over the past decade so screw it, let’s just go for it.

Minimum investment for this new model is $50,000 as compared to the $10,000 for my old one…this is basically for high net worth’s and high rollers, willing to risk it…because I seriously haven’t “gone all in” in a very long time so it’s gonna be interesting as to what happens…obviously I’m still gonna cut losses quickly, so the losses shouldn’t be too bad, but either way, this will be riskier.

Your choices:

Learn my #1 ranked out of 35,000 traders strategy yourself by becoming a TIMalert subscribers and watching my comprehensive instructional DVD packages

Try my new aggressive auto-trading account with a $50k minimum

Or play it “safe” with my original auto-trading account with a $10k minimum

Don’t bother asking me any questions about auto-trading, I just do the trades…talk to Covestor with all your questions and problems, they love customer service, they can’t get enough of it.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • HackerNews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks

Tags: , ,

  • SpeculatorSpectator
    Will you trade stocks like OSMEF. Cause then you wont have to go in all the time and would be up 589,400%


    check out the fact below



    http://www.google.com/finance?q=osmef
  • thomasblondet
    Hi Tim, I have been following you closely for more than a year now. Tried to replicate your strategy (I unsubscribed to your email alerts today) but did not have the time to properly execute it (working in M&A;).


    I am seriously considering investing in your new CVIM account and am in the process of applying for a new IB account.



    Couple questions:

    - Isn't the $50K threshold incompatible with your strategy of investing in penny / low volume stocks ?

    - Don't you have too much on your plate with this new account ?

    - How diligent can we expect you to be with it ? Do you have significant skin in the game ?



    Just want to make sure to leverage the work I have been doing researching your strategy.



    I would appreciate if you could answer. You can do so in my Covestor account (Thomas Blondet) or with the email provided below.



    Thank you and keep the good work !
  • trading new acocunts doesnt matter, just depends on the strength of the setups which will tell me how risky a trade is...my EONC short would've been an all in type trade since I proved the company's PR was dead wrong and the company didnt want to admit the -8% revenue growth truth. (of course all covestor auto-trading trades require $50 million marketcaps so that trade didnt count...just using that setup as an example of when to go big)


    $50k is a pittance to what my strategy can hold, over $5million will be a problem
  • Jamalchahboune
    If your so sure of yourself, you should use some leverage (on the true gimmes). Seriously, with your track record you might as well use some when you are so sure of the play. Also, when you have 1000+ people making a trade after you, it gives you a margin of safety.
  • a.) never gonna use leverage


    b.) u and i both know 99% of timalert subscribers dont do the trades, dont give me that crap
  • Hi Tim,


    Long time reader, So you will be taking this one very seriously? on 200% returns for the year you will make account holders $100k a year, not bad at all... is this sort of figure possile and do you only take money when you profit, or you get 2% of each trade no matter what it does?



    I am in Europe, so can I make this trade or is it only for USA members?
  • TheWood
    Tim,


    Give me an update to IMGG....



    Are they for real?
  • CK
    Thanks Tim. Is "available to borrow" ever an issue for CV.IM subscribers, depending on whether they use TD Ameritrade or IB, for your AGG strategy?
blog comments powered by Disqus