CHATROOM

Reuters, New York Magazine Feature Articles and More Details on TIM

Watch these 7 free video lessons on how I became a millionaire

Reuters came out with a sweet feature on TIM yesterday; it’s a good summary of what I’ve done and what I’m trying to do here. Other than the fact that the reporter mistakenly said my fund earned 70% annual returns (the fund’s cumulative return for 2003-2005 was 70%), and my fund collapsed (the fund’s drawdown was 35% over 2 years, not quite a collapse and investors didn’t ask for t

heir money back – I decided to close the fund so I could create TIM ), it’s a pretty damn good article.

And, yes, I am a failed hedge fund manager, failure is not as bad as everyone assumes, it’s all part of the learning process, aka NECESSARY IN THE LONG RUN! These losses have made me much wiser and gave me an incredible education with regards to the risks involved in this profession. Only now – now that I’m battle-scarred – do I feel worthy of providing accurate commentary. The good news is I’m only about 1/3 off my highs so for all my mistakes – and there have been many – I’ve done a great many things right (one of which is to shun the use of leverage).

Not to be outdone, within hours, New York Magazine followed that up with a brief feature entitled Timothy Sykes Will Not Be Stopped, Gosh Darn It! and a crazy photo of me I’ve never seen before. Cool, I agree. Definitely check it out.

And what’s press without feedback–I’m getting a ton of emails as to the specifics of TIM . Awesome, keep ‘em coming, I want to encourage the sharing of information and debate because industry regulations sure as hell don’t!

Let me clarify TIM’s rules and purpose:

1. I’ll be posting my trade, thoughts, whatever I think will help people better understand me, my investment strategies and trading on www.timothysykes.com

2. I will restart with $12,415 not because that’s all I have left (c’mon, don’t believe the rumors, I’m only 1/3 off my highs!), but because this will put me on par withas a great many investors and traders, helping them to better relate to what I’m doing.

3. I will not stop writing, detailing and using my big mouth to promote the benefits of responsible financial speculation until I have repeated my feat of turning said $12,415 into $1.65 milion. This is not some publicity stunt, it’s my turn to show the world the process and complexity behind responsible financial speculation. I don’t expect this to be an easy jurney, but I do believe I can accomplish this within 10 years. Since I’ve already been through this, I know the real joy is in the quest, not the end result (although the end result will sure be damn satisfying!)

4. I will not use leverage. The main reason why I’m still in this game and only 1/3 off my highs is because I don’t use this detstable concoction. The first time I turned $12,415 into $1.65 million in 4 years, I used 10% leverage once – and I was dead wrong, losing nearly $100,000 on the position (as I detail in my book). I understand leverage might help me reach my goal quicker, but it also opens up the possibility of disaster, which I cannot encourage.

5. TIM is not just about me proving that I can make this astounding type of return again. It’s more important for me to do it in a conservative (OK, somewhat consverative) fashion to help others see that responsible financial speculation is a possible an. No matter what many others claim, I think this should type of investing should be encouraged, not derided. Since I will be posting all the details of this adventure each day, I expect a great many people will be watching. I will not promote wild financial speculation. That is dangerous and this is not something to be taken lightly. Getting rich is not an easy process and I intend to show everyone EXACTLY what it takes to get there.

6. I will trade all type of stocks, but will focus mainly on microcaps and smallcaps as that is my specialty. This niche, while condemned by the mainstream press as pure gambling, offers incredible rewards (if you understand the rewards) and is ideal for smaller account sizes. Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) and Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) are fine for long-term investing, but they’re not going to help you make 100+ times your money within a few years.

7. Even though I want to get started trading right away, I’m going to take the weekend to research and get my setup in perfect order. I just moved into a new apartmentyesterday on the Upper East Side so my setup is nowhere near perfect right now. In fact, I’m writing this from Starbucks (on 78th and Lex, come say hi!) while I wait for Time Warner Cable to hook me up.

This brings me to TIM lesson #1: Trading is all about preparation – you cannot just dive in and play whatever you feel like without doing thorough research and planning for all possibilities. Whether you’re trading with $2,000, $2 million or even $2 billion, this rule applies to everyone.

Posted in Interviews, Press, TIM Lessons

  • Jake

    What will you play tomorrow then, Tim? Is it another day off for your tan? ;)

  • Jake

    ^^ Tomorrow = today for your timezone

  • YoungGunz

    Couldn’t reserve shares for mnlu this morning on ToS. Can you keep asking later or does it not change through the day?

  • YoungGunz

    Looks like all these are OTCBB stocks as well. May not get any borrows on ToS.

  • YoungGunz

    Tried reserving all 4 of the possible shorts and didn’t get any. ToS I could try again but probably not until after 10am.

  • http://www.test.timothysykes.com timothysykes

    i’ll play any that have good setups…dont thin i prfer getting a tan, i prefer trading, b ut i wont force trades

  • Getshorty

    Got to reserve 900 ubhi on interactive brokers (they have more but I don’t have much money on my IB account)and reserved 1700 shares of zyxi on tos.

    Hope they start falling today.

  • Getshorty

    I am trying to renew my monthly subscription, I can’t find an option for that, Do I just send you the money through paypal and that’s it?

    Still have access here but did not get the email.

    Oh hell yes I want to stay subscribed !!!

  • http://www.test.timothysykes.com timothysykes

    and PS guys, most of these are continue to be hard to borrow until the time is riipe for the to fall…think about it, if u cant short, neither can anybody else, hence little to no selling pressure on the stock….if they never open up, well, thats life, but this is the game

  • Getshorty

    correction: just got the email

  • preisendanz

    Isn’t HOKU a solar stock?

  • Reaper

    Take a look at this chart on MNLU: http://de.finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=5MN.F&t=3m

    The damn thing is cross-listed in Germany and trades more there than here.

    It went down 12% so far today.

  • be-the-ball

    Got 2000 shares of UBHI and ZYXI reserved, no MNLU

  • lamecoder

    What happened pre-market to mnlu?

  • YoungGunz

    damn mnlu down +$1.70

  • be-the-ball

    short ubhi 2.95

  • http://www.test.timothysykes.com timothysykes

    awesome short BTB! i was int he middle of writing todays livestock script, missed it as usual

  • be-the-ball

    covered 1/2 at 2.85 cause I am a big wuss

    $100 gain booked

    stop on other half is 2.95 breakeven, just testing the Tim waters here.

  • be-the-ball

    far from an ideal setup

    1) not very liquid compared to what we like to play
    2) prefer afternoon fades to morning fades, could be a fakeout

    do I sound like Tim? :-)

  • cel

    Tim what a drop on MNLU as you predicted. I could not get in to short it but hope others were able to especially as it dropped so quickly.

    One thing on this you said in the alert that it had big volume but did not go up. By this do you mean that the volume still showed high relative to the volume when the price did go up and yet the price did not move further up, so after the increases from 6.30 to 6.70 for example, where the volume was still relatively high for an initial but the price did not increase further.

    Also that this meant big selling, many short sellers. I can understand the selling as people lock in gains and as more selling the price area consolidates as available buyers were not aggressive enough to move the price higher with the increased supply; but I don’t really understand the short seller component. Is this because they are selling first so additional supply. I read this in Brian Shannons book and wondered how short selling a share actually increased shares available if that makes sense because aren’t you just borrowing it? I suppose you are borrowing it to sell?

    Cheers Cel

  • MikeY

    Could not get any shares of MNLU this morning either :(

  • YoungGunz

    Looks like ubhi took out your stop btb. was rooting for yah. atleast you got profit on half your position.

  • be-the-ball

    Yeah, $100 will buy me a dinner with the wife this weekend…

    volume dried up after the initial pop lower. oh well…not a perfect setup

  • Davey

    By the way with no real set ups around I gotta tell u guys to see The Dark Knight, I saw it yesterday and it was amazing…Heath Ledger gives an oscar worthy performance as the joker.

  • be-the-ball

    tim,

    where was that blog post you showed on your video today, the one with the happy pandit, sad pandit?

  • Oracle of NYC

    Don’t know if anyone else mentioned it, but SPRD looks like a good short.

  • http://www.test.timothysykes.com timothysykes
  • brent

    check

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU